Very useful when homebrewing filters. I am using it now to build crystal filters.
http://www.ke5fx.com/aadeflt.htm
Thanks to KE5FX
Serving the worldwide community of radio-electronic homebrewers. Providing blog support to the SolderSmoke podcast: http://soldersmoke.com
Very useful when homebrewing filters. I am using it now to build crystal filters.
http://www.ke5fx.com/aadeflt.htm
Thanks to KE5FX
I liked Pete's comments on the various (analog, digital, mixed) approaches to homebrew:
http://n6qw.blogspot.com/2022/02/2022-return-to-peashooter-build.html
http://n6qw.blogspot.com/2022/02/2022-peashooter-20m-compact-ssb.html
I too have San Jian digital counters watching the stability of analog VFOs (DX-100, HQ-100, Mythbuster).
Variety is the spice of life!
I also liked Pete's comment about the fellow who does on-the-air menu counseling for FTDX-3000 owners. I sometimes run into guys on the air who want to do something similar with my simple homebrew rigs. They start by making comments about my audio -- they will usually say it is "too high" or something like that. Especially when I'm using the separate transmitter and receiver (which have to be "netted" imprecisely by ear), I have to explain that maybe resort to their RIT control would help. If they persist, I sometimes have to tell them that how my rig sounds depends A LOT on the placement of the carrier oscillator relative to the passband of the crystal filter (most recently, the filter from the 1963 Swan 240). Most of them have never had to do that kind of adjustment, so the "technical discussion" usually ends at that point, with my interlocutor saying 73, and presumably moving on to someone whose rig has menus to fiddle with. (Recently heard audio techno term: "massaging the codec.")
To each his own!
Here is an interesting article that appeared in Wired. It will resonate with many SolderSmoke listeners!
Tony G4WIF suggested that I make this talk available as an audio recording. Good idea. Here it is:
http://soldersmoke.com/N2CQRHomebrewing.mp3
Speaking of 75 meters, Scott sent me this picture of his latest effort: re-building a Heathkit HW-12. FB. This is a way of experiencing (or re-experiencing) the construction of a Heathkit. I did something similar, but much less complicated) with a Heathkit VF-1. Scott did a wonderful job taking this old rig apart. That PC board looks great (see photo below).
Scott's e-mail:
Hi Bill and Grayson, I’m glad to hear of your good results with the 6EA8’s in your MMMrx! I had similar results when I finally got rid of the 6U8’s with their iffy performance and went with the 6EA8’s. I did put a set of 6GH8A’s and tried it out, it worked, but I don’t have any data on performance improvements. After completing the outboard power supply and audio amplifier, I’ve taken a break from my MMMRx and it’s sitting there on the bench. I’ll get back to it in a while.
In the meantime I’ve started a new project where I’m re-kitting a Heathkit HW-12 eighty meter transceiver. I have completed the disassembly process including the pcb. I bought a Hakko vacuum desoldering iron for taking all (ALL) parts off of the pcb, and it’s bare now. I’m planning to start rebuilding this coming week. 73 Scott WA9WFA
Barefoot technology or simple, non-professional radio technology and real Barefoot power or harmless QRP power, that is what you will find here. There are some complex designs but many designs are simple radio amateur circuits. They will never be used professionally!
These simple circuits and rigs can give you much fun: home brewing, portable activities during holidays, etc.
Batteries and inverted V dipole antenna's with a fishing rod as the center support are all you need to make many QSO's.
Much fun!
Barefoot technology and Barefoot power can give you much fun, but is not perfect... There are disadvantages like VXO control instead of a VFO, direct conversion receivers that receive both sidebands and simple frequency displays that are not so easy to read. But working with such simple equipment is often more exciting than working with a much better commercial transceiver.
Perhaps that you cannot believe that you can make many QSO's with QRP power of only 1 watt. Indeed, some practice is needed in the beginning so do not give up too soon. Every boring standard QSO becomes an exciting experience with QRP power!
--------------
Check out Onno's site: https://www.qsl.net/pa2ohh/
2) Try putting a series LC shunt circuit tuned to 41 MHz at the output of the carrier oscillator (between the oscillator and the buffer).
3) Reduce the voltage to the oscillator/buffer. I have this on a pot, so I can adjust it down to the point where the remnant of the harmonic is no longer audible, while keeping the main carrier osc signal sufficiently strong.
It seemed to work. I could now hear the desired frequency for spotting, without the confusing tone from the spur.
Why had I been able to do this back in 2002 in the Azores using a simple trimmer cap to ground? My guess is that I was using my Drake 2-B as the receiver. The trimmer cap to ground may have reduced harmonic output. And I was probably cranking back the RF gain on the 2-B to the point where I could hear the desired signal but not the remnants of the spur. I have no RF gain control on the Barebones Barbados receiver that I am using in this project.
So, what's the lesson from all this? Well, if you are faced with a serious technical problem, and you find yourself considering complicated and difficult solutions, go to the Dominican Republic for about a month (especially if it is January or February), and then take another look at the problem when you return. If you are unable to travel this far or for this long, taking a walk or taking a weekend break from a troublesome problem will likely have a similar mind-clearing effect.
The video above shows part of a February 1, 2022 QSO with Gar WA5FWC using the split TX/RX 17 meter rig. Gar is an amazing long-time SSB homebrewer who got his start with phasing rigs back in the day.