Podcasting since 2005! Listen to our latest podcast here:

Podcasting since 2005! Listen to Latest SolderSmoke

Showing posts with label FCC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FCC. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 1, 2026

U.S. Administration Supports Ham Radio Homebrew

 


In a decision that puzzled many analysts, the Federal Communications Commission has come out with a new policy that seems to support the at home construction ("homebrew") of amateur radio equipment.  The commission outlined a series of new requirements (see below) that, collectively, seem intended to breathe new life into what many considered a dying art.  

Commission spokesman Brian Cox tied the move to recent efforts by the Administration to bring industry back to the United States:  "For too long we have stood by and watched foreign manufacturers take larger and larger portions of the electronics market in the United States.  Part of this seems to be the unwillingness of many Americans to do what their grandfathers did and actually build their own electronic equipment. These steps are intended to help reverse that trend." Greene's comments may have been undercut by the fact that they were sent from his FCC-provided Iphone (which allegedly was not homebrewed in the USA) and then disseminated via Tik-Tok.  

Sources in the Administration also point to recent tariff moves by the government that will have the effect of removing the incentive of cheap foreign-made equipment.  "Just wait until those 1000 percent tariffs kick in.  You can almost feel those soldering irons warming up!" 

Collectively, this initiative seems tied to the political effort known as MAGA.  An anonymous White House spokesman explained: "First there was MAGA (calling for a return to GREATNESS).  Then came MAHA (HEALTH!).  Now we see MASA:  MAKE AMERICA SOLDER AGAIN.  We think this will be a real winner.  There will be so much winning, American hams will soon get tired of winning."  

The emphasis, a spokesman explained, will be on DOMESTIC production of radio equipment.  "We see the Michigan Mighty Mite as a good example.  I mean it just oozes domesticity!  MICHIGAN!  Why can't we go back to the day when millions of MMM rigs dotted our fruited plains, and people happily conversed via Morse Code using homemade transmitters?  Well we can.  And dammit we will, whether people like it or not!" 

Construction techniques will also be closely regulated, and the naming of these techniques has become an issue:  "We like the 'Manhattan' style of construction, but the name is too, well, too 'New York City.'  So we are re-naming the technique:  From now on it will be known as the 'Mississippi Technique.'  We also discovered that all of the Crazy Glue used in the Manhattan -- I mean Mississippi -- Technique comes from overseas.  So from now on, only good-old Elmer's Glue can be used.  MASA!" 

In a related move, the FCC announced that henceforth, only American Morse will be permitted in the United States. The use of International Morse Code will be banned, and masked ICE agents will destroy any equipment found to be using it.  "I mean, we invented it right?   So when did we go all 'woke globalist international'?  Enough of that."  It is hoped that this move will reduce the number of radio contacts with foreigners, something the FCC finds "highly woke suspicious."  "Americans should  be talking only to other Americans, right? "  An exception seems to have been made for one country: contacts with Russia will be allowed to continue.  No explanation for this exception was provided. 

Tuesday, April 1, 2025

FCC to Ban Direct Conversion Receivers

From the FCC News Line:  

The Federal Communications Commission announced today that it will soon ban a wide range of communications equipment due to interference that this equipment is causing to Starlink communications satellites in Low Earth Orbit (LEO).  The banned equipment includes a range of legacy analog-type circuitry that, according to the Commission, has "lost relevance" and constitutes "an archaic electromagnetic nuisance."  Under the proposed Commission action, banned equipment will include all regenerative, super-regenerative, and direct conversion receivers.  

The interference potential of regenerative receivers has been known since the 1920s.  Direct Conversion receivers were thought to be less prone to Problematic Spurious Emission (PSE),  but in recent months  LEO satellites have experienced serious interference from terrestrial sources.  

An FCC official was nearly apoplectic when speaking about the devices that are causing this interference:  "They have no shielding.  They are built on wooden boards, and are made with superglue!  Heck, the main tuning device is -- get this -- a screw! A screw!  To think that something like that could threaten an entire LEO satellite system.  This is really unacceptable."  The official said that two persons in Northern Virginia had encouraged the construction of these "terrorist devices."  The FCC is working with the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security to bring these people to justice. 

The vast majority of the interference is believed to come from home-made ("homebrew")  direct conversion receivers.  These devices employ simple oscillators in the 7 MHz range.  The 85th harmonic of these oscillators falls in the middle of the UHF frequencies used by the satellite system.  The interference appears when the satellites are over areas known to be used by ham radio direct conversion enthusiasts.  There have been communications issues near Melbourne  Australia, the North Island of New Zealand,  Bali Indonesia, all across the U.S. (especially in the area of Nashua, NH), Canada, the UK,  Holland,  and Sweden. Recently there have been reports of interference from Argentina. 

A satellite company CEO of has been briefed on the matter, and promised to use his influence in the U.S. government to "squash this problem like a bug."  The spokesperson for a major ham radio organization in the United States reassured members: "Don't worry, commercial SDR transceivers will not be affected by this ban." 

Wednesday, February 1, 2023

Hammarlund HQ-100 Misidentified in 1963 FCC Film


Oh the indignity!  It appears at 7 minutes 16 seconds in this FCC film.  It is clearly an HQ-100, but the FCC subtitles identify it at an HQ-110.  It is clearly an HQ-100 ( the model without the clock). 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzPIOfpKkRM

As the owner and operator of what must be one of the few remaining HQ-100s, I feel obligated to defend the reputation of this fine piece of shortwave gear.   

How many of you have HQ-100s?  


Tuesday, October 6, 2015

The Advancement Of The Radio Art and The Enhancement of International Goodwill

U.S. Code of Federal Regulations
 
PART 97—AMATEUR RADIO SERVICE
Subpart A—General Provisions
§97.1   Basis and purpose.
The rules and regulations in this part are designed to provide an amateur radio service having a fundamental purpose as expressed in the following principles:
(a) Recognition and enhancement of the value of the amateur service to the public as a voluntary noncommercial communication service, particularly with respect to providing emergency communications.
(b) Continuation and extension of the amateur's proven ability to contribute to the advancement of the radio art.
(c) Encouragement and improvement of the amateur service through rules which provide for advancing skills in both the communication and technical phases of the art.
(d) Expansion of the existing reservoir within the amateur radio service of trained operators, technicians, and electronics experts.
(e) Continuation and extension of the amateur's unique ability to enhance international goodwill.

----------------------

On a recent podcast I mentioned that I like the phrase "the radio art."  I also mentioned that I heard some objections to this term.  A couple of guys wrote in on this --see below. 
I found out that the phrase features prominently in Part 97 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations.  This is the document that establishes ham radio in the U.S.  (see above)
I really like the last line of the first section of Part 97: e) Continuation and extension of the amateur's unique ability to enhance international goodwill.  Yea!  That's us!  The International Brotherhood of Electronic Wizards! 

------------------------
 
Bill:
Was listening to episode 180 and heard you mention that some people had taken exception to using the label “Art” for radio electronics.  You should refer them to the Webster’s definition of art,
 
art. noun \ˈärt\ : something that is created with imagination and skill and that is beautiful or that expresses important ideas or feelings. 
 
Often the patent office, much older than radio, will invalidate a patent application based on “prior art”.
 
Keep up the great podcast!  As soon as I finish a couple of other projects, I’m going to try to build Pete’s LBS design.  First, I have got to get a mobile rig installed in my new truck, commuting without it is just too boring.
 
72,
Don
WD4ON
 
-----------------------
 
Bill:
I was listening to episode #180 on the on the way into my office this morning and wanted to send you a quick note on the phrase "radio arts." Another example of why "art" is indeed the proper term is that the United States Patent Office (USPTO) classifies patents into, you guessed it "Art Units": http://www.uspto.gov/patents-application-process/patent-search/understanding-patent-classifications/patent-classification .
For example, Art Unit 2621, Class 178 - Telegraphy (http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc178/defs178.htm) which is related to Class 455 Telecommunications (http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc455/defs455.htm)
and many many more as you can well imagine.
Going even further, the basis for our patent system is in Article One, Section 8, Clause 8 of the US Constitution:
"To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries;"
Which in turn was the basis for the first patent statute, The Patent Act of 1790: http://docs.law.gwu.edu/facweb/claw/patact1790.htm
Keep up the good work in furthering the radio arts!
73,
Tim
KA9EAK
---------------------------------
 

Thursday, January 22, 2009

Busted... By the FCC

When I was a kid, I lived in fear that one day men in black suits from the Federal Government would appear on the front steps of our house in Congers, NY. I worried that they would discover some harmonic from my Heath HW-32A doing something awful to air traffic control comms.... or perhaps they would want to check my log book (that would have definitely resulted in jail time).

George, K8VU, sent along this link to an article about a kid who DID get a visit from the FCC:
http://www.rwonline.com/article/72138

The Radio World site seems to have a very nice collection of articles. Thanks George.