Podcasting since 2005! Listen to Latest SolderSmoke

Showing posts with label direct conversion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label direct conversion. Show all posts

Monday, January 20, 2025

SolderSmoke Direct Conversion Receiver Project -- Video #2 -- Building the PTO/VFO

The response to the SolderSmoke DCR challenge has been terrific -with nearly 7,000 views of the first episode!  Thanks so much for checking it out.  The goal is to convince you that you can build your own receiver and then go get you started on Homebrew ham radio.  We already have confirmation that it can be done!  Congratulations to Peter, VK3PTM and Matthew, KY4EOD who have both completed the receiver.  The boards look good and, even better, they sound great.   Videos and descriptions are here on the blog and on the SolderSmoke Discord sever.   Speaking of the Discord server, we already have a very robust conversation going,  It’s a great place to give feedback and to get your questions answered. Builders are helping builders and we at SolderSmoke are trying to answer as many of your questions as we can.  This is a beginner’s project, so all are welcome.

 

In episode 2 of the SolderSmoke Direct Conversion Receiver challenge we tackle the PTO.  We discuss a bit of the theory, walk through the schematic, and take you step-by-step through building and testing the oscillator and buffert.  By the time we are done we will have achieved JOO!  (the Joy of Oscillation).  And when you build it you will be 1/4th of the way to having build your own 40 meter receiver.

 

 

Links:

 

Join the discussion - SolderSmoke Discord Server

https://discord.gg/XMScV9HT

 

Documentation on Hackaday

https://hackaday.io/project/190327-high-schoolers-build-a-radio-receiver

 

SolderSmoke YouTube channel

https://www.youtube.com/@soldersmoke

 

SolderSmoke blog

https://soldersmoke.blogspot.com/search/label/TJ%20DC%20RX

SolderSmoke Direct Conversion Receiver Project: The Input to the Mixer from the VFO -- How Much Is Enough?


I was asked to post some pictures of how the input from the VFO (from the J-310) to the diode ring mixer looks.  The picture above is the VFO output across a 47 ohm resistor to ground through the .1 uf cap to the drain of the J-310.  The mixer is NOT connected.   The question is: Is this enough VFO signal?   

Realize that the VFO is just turning the diodes on and off at the VFO rate.  See this page for more details: 
Look carefully at the scope pattern and at the diagram.  Also look at Alan Wolke W2AEW's excellent video (URL in the above post).  You will see the importance of the VFO turning on and off the diodes.  This is how the diode ring multiplies by 1 and -1.  This is how mixing happens.  This is how audio is produced.  

Now, back to the question:  Is the output we see above "enough."   We can check to see if the VFO is turning on and off the diodes by reconnecting the mixer to the VFO and looking again at the mixer's VFO input port (with no resistor connected).  This is what I see when I do this: 


Here you can see the diodes being switched on and off on the peaks of the VFO voltage.  That is the flat topping you see.  It looks to me as if this is enough. And indeed I have no problem hearing down to the band noise (I can hear an increase in the hiss when I connect the antenna) and I can hear plenty of CW, FT-8 and LSB signals.  I am using ordinary 1N4148 silicon diodes.  

Often we hear manufacturers say that their mixer (like the SBL-1) needs 7 dbm (about 1.4519 V peak to peak across 50 ohms) input from the VFO.  But I think that is just for the SBL-1.  Ours is a homebrew diode ring.  It is, I think, different. So it might not NEED 7 dbm.  In fact, look at the voltage level differences:  Across the 50 ohm resistor we see 504 mV p-p.  But with the diode ring connected we see 1.5 V p-p.  This implies that the LO port input impedance is not 50 ohm, but is probably around 150 ohms.  Indeed when I put a 150 ohm resistor across the output of the VFO (no mixer connected) I measured aroung 1.4 V p-p 

Bottom line:  Just make sure your VFO is turning the diodes on and off. 

Monday, January 13, 2025

SolderSmoke Direct Conversion Challenge -- Video #1

This is the first in a series of videos and postings on the SolderSmoke Direct Conversion Receiver challenge.  Dean, KK4DAS takes us through an overview of the project.  He covers the architecture of the receiver, construction techniques, component sourcing and selection and generally sets the stage for the build.  Future videos will cover each board in detail.

 

We are very excited invite you to join the SolderSmoke Discord server.  This is an experiment to see if Discord is a good forum for SolderSmoke listeners to interact with us and each other on topics of interest.  For now, we will be used Discord exclusively for discussion of the DCR challenge.   To join the SolderSmoke Discord server click on the link below.

 

Links and references:

 

     Join the discussion - SolderSmoke Discord Server

     https://discord.gg/XMScV9HT

     Documentation on Hackaday

      High Schoolers Build a Radio Receiver | Hackaday.io

     SolderSmoke YouTube channel

      SolderSmoke -- Homebrew Ham Radio - YouTube

     SolderSmoke blog

      https://soldersmoke.blogspot.com/search/label/TJ%20DC%20RX

Monday, January 6, 2025

Scott KQ4AOP's PTO Coil Forms for the High-School Direct-Conversion Receiver (Video)


Scott KQ4AOP listened to amateur radio signals for the first time using a homebrew receiver.  That is really something.  See:  https://soldersmoke.blogspot.com/search?q=KQ4AOP

Scott then very kindly offered to 3D print the coil form for the PTO that is one of the four stages of our High School receiver project.  The above video shows the coil forms being 3D printed on Scott's machine, and explains where some of them are going. 

Dean KK4DAS will soon launch a video and e-mail-based build of the receiver.  Stay tuned. Dean's series should clear up any remaining questions about how to build this receiver.  As Scott so rightly said: 

"This was my first receiver build and, it was great fun. When you finish the build and prove you are able to tune through the band, you are welcomed into the secret society! The build is the initiation. I am happy to print and ship the PTO if needed."  

Saturday, January 4, 2025

Donnie WA9TGT's Direct Conversion Receivers


Donnie WA9TGT writes: 

I recently built my first basic 40 meter (DC receiver) from http://www.qrpkits.com/  that uses the common SA602 & LM386 chip combo with Varactor diode tuning. I didn’t want to scratch build a DC Rx simply because I first wanted to build up this simple kit with its included PCB and at least play with it a little just to see if it was something I mite wanted to further pursue. I’ve since decided yes I want to, even with all a DC receivers short comings. It’s was nearly as rewarding hearing my call being sent back to me for the very first time coming through this little DC Rx after calling CQ as it was back in 1966 during my very first Novice contact. 


Donnie's inspirational QRZ.com page:  https://www.qrz.com/db/WA9TGT

Friday, December 27, 2024

Derek N9TD's Magnificent Build of the TJ Direct Conversion Receiver

 

I think it is magnificent.  Derek N9TD fought his EE tendencies and recognized that the perfect can be the enemy of the good.  So he went ahead and built this receiver pretty much as we intended it to be built:  Four stages:  BP filter, PTO, Diode Ring Mixer, Super-simple AF amp. 

He went several steps further and added a fixed coil to slow down the tuning and keep it in the 40 meter band.  He added an RF gain control.  And he went with a steel (vs. brass) screw.  But these are all things that I myself have done.  (We still advise people to build it the simple way first.) FB Derek. 

The challenge is still out there.  The gauntlet has been thrown down.  Derek's completed project shows us that this project is entirely do-able.  Do it!   

Derek wrote: 

Bill, 

Let me introduce myself, I am a recent electrical engineering graduate from Purdue and a long-time listener of the podcast. I want to thank you and Pete for being one of the reasons I chose to pursue my degree in the first place. I'll admit that in the more difficult stretches of getting my degree, I often pulled out the podcast to be reminded of the fun that can be had with radio and electronics.

Until recently I had to hang my head low along with the majority of the other 'appliance operators' out there having never built anything with my two hands that can be used to pull signals out of the ether.

 I am no stranger to building projects, PCBs, and melting solder but I usually chose to either stick to the dreaded digital domain or focus on antennas, filters, and other ancillary equipment. The logic being that I like to have a "known good" radio for the shack and that I would focus on other equipment to supplement the radio. I still follow this logic when I want to contest and we all know that antennas are well worth the effort, I've just finally had enough of being an appliance operator and have your podcast to thank for the extra push. 

I had been following the original effort of the TJ DCRX with interest from the start and earmarked this project as one I would like to build based on its inherent simplicity and good performance. However, the demands of school and a recent (at the time) abortive attempt to build an AM superhet with an SA602 the year prior made me  (I got as far as feeling the joy of oscillation but regretfully petered out after that) put this one the backburner for about two years until December 2024.

By coincidence, I independently decided to start this project just before your show with the HRWB folks and the gauntlet being thrown down, which has spurred many to build this receiver. It has been great to see the extra coverage on the receiver, and the commentary has been very insightful for someone trying to build this for the first time and with as many of the "improvements" as possible. 

For better or for worse, I'm the type of guy who wants to understand the "why" behind all the design choices and, from there, try to incorporate as many lessons and improvements as possible to make the "best" version possible. I'm not saying I make the best version of anything, but it's just a quirk of the way I think and justify doing a project. It always has to be "this and some additional improvement;" otherwise, I would decide against doing it. 

Rambling aside, I ended up building the DCRX, adding the RF attenuator from N3FJZ's website, and incorporating the lessons you learned after experimenting with improving the tuning on the PTO. I added an external series inductor wound on a dowel rod and used a zinc-coated steel screw as opposed to brass. I found that this gave solid tuning performance across 40m and was easy enough to tune in CW or SSB signals (after 3D printing a large knob for the PTO bolt). Alan W2AEW's video on mixers was a great tutorial to use to verify that my mixer was mixing. With the radio assembled I was treated to the joy of hearing my receiver breathe in the sounds of 40m for the first time last weekend and even managed to copy some Croatian DX during last week's contest. As Farhan said to do, I have spent the last few days enjoying the receiver and figuring out its quirks before moving on to the next step. 

The only "issue" I have noticed is that I still get some AM breakthrough despite tuning in the bandpass filter. The problem is very noticeable if I accidentally put my finger on the wires going to the AF gain pot. If I do that the AM station is the only thing I can hear. This makes me think the problem is after the bandpass filter and more investigation is needed. Maybe using coax on the control lines to shield it will help? Regardless I am impressed with how well the receiver sounds, the stability of the oscillator, and the effectiveness of the simple audio amp....  

Again thank you and Pete for your work on the podcast and for helping inspire countless homebrew radio operators! 

As a thanks for reading through this long email, I'll leave you with some photos of my build as a reward. 

73s,
 Derek N9TD

Saturday, December 21, 2024

KE5HPY's Altoids Direct-Conversion Receiver for 40 Meters

Click on the image for a much clearer view.

It is a thing of beauty.  You can see all four stages in there.  There is the Bandpass Filter in the upper left.  Below that is the VFO.  In the center you can see the SBL-1 mixer. Off to the right is the audio amplifier.  FB Chuck! 

Chuck KE5HPY writes: 

Allow me to add an endorsement of the joy and practicality of the DC receiver. Whether XTO, VFO or DDS, ring diode mixer, or Polykov, the DC IF concept is a real winner.  They really deliver wonderful audio and clarity that is very satisfying for homebrew builder.


Thought you might enjoy these photos of a 40 m receiver and built 10 or so years ago.  The design is straight out of EMRFD.  At that time, the Altoid tin craze was in full swing and this is one of several projects I stuffed in a tin.  This compact receiver has traveled on lots of camping and kayak trips where it delivered good DX reception using only a 30 foot piece of wire for antenna running back to the tent. It’s fun to hear intercontinental QSOs when you’re in the middle of nowhere. With my 40 m dipole attached at home, I think this little rig can hear anything my Icom hears.  

It’s great that you’re promoting this practical technology. Keep up the good work.

Wednesday, December 11, 2024

An Evening Bandscan on 40 Meters using the High-School Direct-Conversion Receiver


This video shows how useful this receiver really is.  Build one of these!

Monday, December 9, 2024

Listening to 40 meters on the DC Receiver -- And I Heard a Distinguished Homebrewer!


I made the video above to show postential builders how useful our Direct Conversion receiver really is.  Late in the video (starting at 11:17), I heard a station calling CQ.  It was N4QR.  A check of QRZ.com shows it was Bob Null.  Here is picture from Bob's QRZ page: 


Check out the old general coverage receiver and -- wait for it -- the homebrew thermatron transmitter.  TRGHS. 

Google led me to this amazing video by Stever N4LQ that describes a book that N4QR put together on how to build thermatron transmitters from Junkbox/Hamfest parts: 


Steve N4LQ is in contact with Bob N4QR and asked him which transmitter he was using when I heard him.  Bob said he thinks it was his 30 watt 807 final transmitter. 


Thanks Bob. and thanks Steve!


Sunday, December 8, 2024

"The Build Is the Initiation" -- KQ4AOP Offers Encouragement and a PTO Coil Form for Receiver Builders

Scott KQ4AOP put a comment on a recent SolderSmoke Blog post that I found especially encouraging and apprportiate. He was writing about his experience building the High School Direct Conversion receiver.  

Scott wrote:

"This was my first receiver build and, it was great fun. When you finish the build and prove you are able to tune through the band, you are welcomed into the secret society! The build is the initiation. I am happy to print and ship the PTO if needed." 

The 3d printed form for the tuning inductor is often a show-stopper for prospective builders.  Scott offers to print out a form for you, and send it to you. 

Scott's mailing address is on his QRZ page.  His e-mail address is: streez55@gmail.com

 Thanks Scott! 

Here is a post I did early this year on Scott's receiver: 


Here are the SolderSmoke Posts about this project  (keep scrolling -- there are 41 posts!):

Saturday, December 7, 2024

My Receiver Doesn't Work Right! What Should I Do?

An early version of our DC receiver.  Note the tuning guide under the grey tuning knob. 

We prepared this for use by the high school students who were building direct conversion receivers. Unfortunately none of them got to the point where they would use this little article, but given the fact that a number of people are now engaged in direct conversion receiver projects, I thought it would be a good idea to post this here. Also, much of this applies more generally to receiver problems. 

My receiver doesn’t work right!

What should I do?

First, relax.  You will be able to get it to work.  The design is good, people around the world have built this receiver, and you will be able to get it to work.  But homebrew radio is not plug-and-play radio.  Sometimes a new receiver needs some tweaking, peaking, and coaxing. 

Realize that the 40 meter band has its ups and downs.  The downs usually come at mid-day.  The sun’s position high in the sky causes a build up of the D layer of the ionosphere.  This tends to absorb radio waves. So signals are often weak at mid-day.  Signals will be much stronger in the morning, and in the evening.

Can you hear the “band noise” when you connect your antenna?   This sounds like hiss or static.  Some of this is the result of thunderstorms in Brazil.  Some of it is from events far away in the cosmos. Some of it comes from the weed whacker down the block!  But if you can hear this noise, that is a very good sign that your receiver is working.  The signals you are looking for will be stronger than this band noise.

Where are you tuning?  Your receiver tunes from about 6.8 MHz (with the screw all the way our) to about 7.8 MHz (screw all the way in).  But we are only really interested in the ham frequency band between 7.0 MHz and 7.3 MHz.  Try to tune your receiver near the middle of the tuning range (with the screw about half-way in).  You should hear morse code from about 7.0 to 7.06 MHz.  Then you should hear strong digital signals at 7.074 MHz.  Tuning further up (screw going in) you should start to hear hams speaking to each other using Single Sideband.   At first they will sound like Donald Duck.

 Don’t worry about the Donald Duck speech!  Just carefully tune through the signal until you hit the spot where the speech sounds normal.  You may have to tune up and down a bit until you find the right spot.  Now you can listen. 

 If you tune further up you will hear Shortwave Broadcast band AM signals.  You will be able to tune them in.  Sort of.  But they will sound distorted.  This is unavoidable with this kind of receiver.  But you will be able to hear the hams on Single Sideband with no distortion.

Sometimes you will only hear one side of the conversation.  That is normal.  The other station may be either too far away from you, or too close to you.  You may be outside his or her skip zone.

One very obvious thing to check:  How is your battery?  Is it drained, or is it still at about 9 volts?   You may need to change it.

How is your antenna?   It doesn’t have to be fancy or elaborate.   33 feet of wire will do.  But it does need to be up in the air a bit.  And you need to have the 33 foot counterpoise wire connected to the ground (on the PC board).  With many pieces of consumer electronics antennas are kind of optional – the devices will often work without them.  Not so with ham gear.  Antennas are important.  If you are not receiving signals,  it may be because of your antenna.


Wednesday, December 4, 2024

Challenge Accepted! Why we Designed the High-School Direct-Conversion Receiver the Way we Did

Dean KK4DAS's Beautiful DC Receiver

The folks over at Ham Radio Workbench have graciously accepted the challenge issued in our last podcast: that they scratch-build homebrew the 40 meter Direct Conversion receiver that Dean KK4DAS and I designed for local high school students.  We want to help our brothers over at HRWB.  For example, we may be able to supply a few of the 3D printed PTO coil forms.  Here is some background information on the project. 

Details on the project can be found here: 
----------------------

Design Decisions in the Direct Conversion Receiver

Why did we do it this way?

In thinking about how to design this receiver, we had to make early design decisions on almost every stage.  Here are some of our key considerations.

VARIABLE FREQUENCY OSCILLATOR:

Normally we might have used a variable capacitor to change the frequency of this oscillator.  But variable capacitors are now expensive and hard-to-source.  Our friend Farhan in Hyderabad used a simple variable inductor for this purpose in his “Daylight Again” transceiver. The coil form for this part could be 3D printed.  A metallic screw would vary the inductance as it is screwed in and out of the coil.  

We also decided to use the same simple Colpitts oscillator circuit used by Farhan in his own high school direct conversion receiver.  This circuit is unusual in that the feedback capacitors are also the frequency determining elements (along with the variable inductor).  This simplified the circuit and reduced the parts count, and proved to be remarkably stable.

For the VFO buffer we used the simple JFET buffer from Farhan’s Daylight Again design.  

Based on suggestions from other radio amateurs, we developed a simple frequency readout based on the position of the end of the tuning screw  (how far in or out?).

We selected the 40 Meter band for this receiver because we thought it would be easier to get the VFO stable on this frequency, and because Farhan had built his receiver for 40 meters.

MIXER:

At first we hoped to use a simple singly-balanced mixer using two diodes and a single trifilar transformer.   But we found unacceptably high levels of AM breakthrough (mostly from Radio Marti on 7335 kHz) when using this circuit.  So we switched to a diode ring.  This required two more diodes and an additional trifilar transformer.   We believed the students would have great difficulty building and installing two trifilar transformers so early in their building experience.  So we used transformers that had been wound in Hyderabad by a women’s collective employed by Farhan, and developed a scheme for fool-proof installation of these transformers.

We also found that the mixer needed a diplexer at its output – this would provide a 50 ohm termination at all frequencies and would result in much cleaner action by the mixer and greatly reduced AM breakthrough from Radio Marti.   We used the same circuit used by Roy Lewellen W7EL in his Optimized Transceiver circuit.

BANDPASS FILTER: 

This was the simplest board in the project but it required the students to wind two coils on toroidal cores.  A simple dual-tuned circuit design would be sufficient.  We used component values from the QRP Labs website.  We showed them how to wind the coils, and made a video about the technique.  Students used a simple Vector Network Analyzer (Nano VNA)  to tune the filter.

 

AUDIO AMPLIFIER: 

We had to make several design decisions here.  First, we rejected the idea of using an IC amplifier like the ubiquitous LM-386. We wanted this to be a completely analog and discrete component experience. Then we rejected the idea of using a push-pull output circuit.  While this would have eliminated the need for an audio output transformer, it would have resulted in a more complicated circuit.  In the end we opted for three simple RC-coupled common-emitter amplifiers with an audio output transformer.  There was no feedback in these circuits.  We found there is a lot of gain (hFe) variation in the 2N3904 transistors that we used.  Care needs to be exercised in making sure that transistors of moderate (but not too high) gain are used.  

This AF amplifier chain probably presented a 1500 ohm impedance to the mixer (instead of the desired 50 ohms), but we think this problem may have largely been taken care of by the diplexer.  

We found some very small (one square inch) speakers that could be easily used in this circuit.

ANTENNA:

While the students could use a wide variety of antennas, we recommended a simple ¼ wave antenna with a ¼ wave counterpoise.  We thought that this antenna – of only 33 feet in length would provide good performance with low complexity, and would be well suited to the “upper floor bedrooms” from  which many of the students would be listening.  Also, this antenna would not require the use of coaxial cable or an impedance matching transformer. We made a video on how to build and use this antenna. 

POWER SUPPLY:

We opted for the use of 9 volt batteries.  This proved to be a safer and wiser choice that limited the kind of mayhem that could occur should a variable voltage supply be used.

Details on the receiver can be found here: 

https://hackaday.io/project/190327-high-schoolers-build-a-radio-receiver

May 29, 2023

Sunday, December 1, 2024

A 40 Meter Direct Conversion Receiver from M0NTV -- With some SolderSmoke Comments


Nick's video appears above. 

First, let me say FB Nick.   It is nice to see you making use of the AGC amp designed by Wes and Bob,  using the board from Todd's Mostly DIY RF, using a mix of homebrew pads and Me-Squares  from Rex, and finally the Franklin Oscillator that we spent so much time talking about on SolderSmoke.  

But here are some comments:  

-- I still don't think you need that RF amplifier in front of the mixer. And I suspect you would be better off without it.  We did not use one in our high school 40 meter project, and never missed it.  In fact, on one version of the high school receiver I even put in a simple 10k pot as an attenuator (no RF amp).  Even up on 20 meters, I do not have an RF amplifier ahead of the diode ring mixer on either of the Mythbuster rigs I have built.  Nick,  maybe experiment a bit more and try the receiver just going from the BP filter into the mixer and see what happens.  

Note that Wes W7ZOI DID NOT have an REF amp ahead of the diode ring mixer in his original 1968 40 meter Direct Conversion receiver (the one that launched the solid-state DC recevier revolution): 


-- The Franklin oscillator is an interesting, but complicated circuit.  The gimmick is, well, gimmicky.  Here is the thing:  You can achieve similar levels of stability using simple conventional, single transistor oscillators.  We dispensed with the variable capacitors, and used PTO--style variable inductors. They worked fine.  This Franklin oscillator still does seem to drift a bit, right?   I would ground the board to the inside of the metal box.    

I would also try putting all the stages on a single ground plane.  This might help.  

Friday, November 22, 2024

Tezukuri and Chappy Happy -- Amazing Videos on Homebrew Radio (from Japan?) - Another 40 Meter Direct Conversion Receiver

So around the time we were building 40 meter direct conversion receivers, someone else was doing something similar.  His product (above) is a lot nicer than ours.  He has an S-meter and a digital frequency readout.  But like ours, his is built on a wooden board.  FB OM.  

If you want to see what a direct conversion receiver can do, watch his video (above). 

I was really amazed to see him use a modified VFO from a Kenwood TS-820.  Not long ago Pete N6QW spotted one of these on e-bay and recommended that I buy it.  As with the Yaesu FT-101 VFOs, we bought it for the gears and reduction drives but ended up with the entire VFO circuit.  I now have one on my shelf, ready to go.  TRGHS. 

We are not sure who Chappy Happy is, but "Tezukuri" means "hand-made" in Japanese. The writing in the video descriptions are in Japanese, then Chinese. 

Here is the YouTube channel.  Amazing stuff here:  https://www.youtube.com/@chappyhappy3675  He is clearly a ham.  He even works on an old S-38.  Who is this guy? 


Tuesday, April 16, 2024

The Rad Receiver from N6GWB

Geoff N6GWB and his eldest have produced a really wonderful receiver, and have joined the elite ranks of those who have built their own receivers.   Congratulations to both!  ( Be sure to watch the video below.)

Geoff writes:

Though I built it, my eldest has retained naming rights.  Behold the Rad Radio Receiver, an Soldersmoke inspired build.  It’s a 40m DC reciever.  I had planned on making this a truly 50-50 N6QW N2CQR build, but I needed to get it done for a show and tell this Wednesday.  I have N6QW dual JFET RF amp and mixer modules.  I have the N2CQR ceramic ocillator circuit from the 2017 DC receiver project.  I had planned on including the all analog audio amp from the more recent N2CQR DC project, but alas, time got the best of me.  I was hoping to make the whole thing all-analog.  (I thought the all analog would get me more “hard work” kudos at the show and tell.) I ended up including a LM386 audio amp making this a bit of a cyborg.


I have included pictures of the receiver open and closed.  The closed pic includes bespoke decals.  I have also include a brief movie demonstrating the audio.

Many, many thanks for the inspiration and knowledge!

Geoff
N6GWB






Sunday, February 4, 2024

Scott KQ4AOP Successfully BUILDS a Receiver (Video) -- This is the Homebrew Spirit at its Maximum

This is just so cool.  Scott KQ4AOP has successfully homebrewed a ham radio receiver.  He used the circuit Dean and I developed (with a lot of input from Farhan and others) for the High School receiver project.  But Scott has had more success than any of our students.  And I think he has had -- in a certain sense -- more success than any of us.  After all, how many of us can say -- as Scott can -- that he used a homebrew receiver that he made to listen -- for the very first time -- to amateur radio signals?  Scott writes:  "Those first sounds were my first time ever hearing any Amateur Radio first hand!" 

In the email below, you can see Scott's deep commitment to homebrew: "I want to build my own gear for 40m. I want to learn morse code. I want my first contact to be on my own gear."  Wow Scott, the building of the receiver is the hard part, and you have already done that.  I think you are well on your way.  

In the video above you can watch Scott tune the entire 40 meter band and a bit beyond. You hear CW at the low end.  Then FT-8.  Then SSB.  Up just above the top of the band I think you can hear our old nemesis Radio Marti.  And this powerful broadcaster is NOT breaking through on the rest of the band.  FB Scott.  Congratulations.  

----------------------------------------------

 Bill,


Thank you for the quick response, direction, and pointers. I won't give up, and I am not in a rush. 

I have wanted my amateur radio license since the early-to-mid-80s. I got my Technician and General in May of 2022 and completed my Extra in May 2023. I always wanted to understand how to design circuits, and I wanted to build them. I share that background to say that I have this impractical goal that I am stubborn enough to stick to (all due respect to you and Pete's advice on the topic of getting on the air). I want to build my own gear for 40m. I want to learn morse code. I want my first contact to be on my own gear. So, your blog and podcast really resonates with me. 

I am only teaching myself at this point. It was the perfect project for my goals. I thought that if all these high school kids in Virginia, Canada, and Germany can do it, it was the sweet spot I was looking for. 

The only transceiver I have was recently gifted to me. It is a Sommerkamp TS-788DX CB radio that allegedly works on 10m in addition to CB. I haven't connected it up because I wanted to stay focused on the HSR. I have a mentor who has gear that I can use to test the oscillator. I am not involved with the nearby ham club, but I know they would help if needed. 

Thanks again and I will keep you posted,

73 Scott KQ4AOP


Bill and Dean - Thank you for sharing and documenting this receiver. I greatly appreciate you publishing the circuit, class notes, and build videos. That got me 75% to completion.
I feel blessed that both of you chipped in and encouraged me through the troubleshooting to finally getting the receiver to start “breathing RF”.
Those first sounds were my first time ever hearing any Amateur Radio first hand!

Friday, February 2, 2024

First Light! First Signals received on Version II of Homebrew 15-10 Transceiver

Ianis S51DX in Slovenia was the first call sign heard. Some peaking and tweaking remains to be done, but the receiver is working.

Congratulations to Scott KQ4AOP who got his Direct Conversion receiver working yesterday, And congratulations to Armand WA1UQO who got his regen receiver working. I think all of us are following Farhan's advice and are taking some time to just listen to the receivers we have built ourselves.

Saturday, October 28, 2023

Mattia Zamana's Amazing Direct Conversion Receiver

Thanks to Ed KC8SBV for sending me this awesome video.  It looks like Mattia built this receiver way back in 1995.  The tuning indicator is very cool, and I had not seen a similar indicator before (could this be a way for us to escape the clutches of the San Jian counters or the Arduinos?)  The Italian ham magazine articles are great, and you can follow the rig description even if you can't read the Italian.  The pictures in in the attached drive are also very good.  

WB9ZKY used Google Translate to get English versions of the articles.  Thanks Chuck! 

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/kil3osilchqlyk8afim2r/part1.pdf?rlkey=9ubgaqb8t4k91d1a10su9mw1p&dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/t2790qatf5riepyqh5oj1/part2.pdf?rlkey=bhs77gkcchziakh7ngjbpuaz7&dl=0

I have been in touch with Mattia via YouTube:  He reports that he has done other electronic projects, but he considers this to be the most interesting.  He does not have a ham license -- he has a Shortwave Listener license.  His father was a ham:  I3ZQG. 

This is one of the rare cases in which the builder should -- I think -- be issued his ham licence purely on the basis of this build.  

Mattia writes:  

Jul 25, 2023 ITALIA

Mattia Zamana


Monday, October 23, 2023

Bringing a Faulty Herring Aid 5 Receiver Into the Light -- Fixing the AF Amp Schematic Error (video)


I picked up this old homebrew receiver in March 2023 at the Vienna Wireless Society's Winterfest Hamfest.  It is a Herring Aid 5.   I was surprised to see that the builder (who was he?) got the windings on the VFO transformer right.  Later, I learned that he had also substituted MPF-102s for the original Radio Shack FETs called for in the QST article. This allowed him to overcome the PC board layout problem at Q5 (VFO).  With an MPF-102, he was able to get Q1 working by kind of shoe-horning the leads into the proper holes.  FB OM.  Whoever he was, he seemed like a really competent builder.

The Hamfest Herring Aid 5

But then I started wondering:  Did he also overcome the big problem in the audio amplifier?  You see, there is an egregious error in the QST schematic.  Between the collector of Q3 and the base of Q4 (the two AF amplifiers) they have a 10uF capacitor to ground.  That would send most of the audio to ground. This is clearly a mistake.  Not only does it not make any sense, but this cap to ground does not appear in the PC board drawing, nor in the photograph that went with the QST article.  I included this cap in my 2014 built of the Herring Aid 5, but with it, I found the receiver to be exceedingly deaf.  When I clipped that capacitor out of the circuit, my 2014 Herring Aid 5 sprang to life.  Did this hamfest Herring Aid 5 have the error capacitor?  Would it too be brought into the light by clipping one lead?  

Sadly, the erroneous third capacitor was there, and it was wired into the circuit.  The receiver worked,  but just barely.  It was very deaf.  You could not hear 40 meter band noise, and you could barely hear strong CW signals.  Builders may have thought that this was normal with such a simple receiver. 

3 10uF caps. The center one is an error.  I have clipped it out

In the video above you can see what happens when I cut the lead to the mistake capacitor.  Suddenly, you can hear band noise, and CW signals.  The receiver comes to life -- for the very first time!  

This was an error that echoed through the decades.  As far as I know there was never a published errata.  The erroneous capacitor is there in the 1977 ARRL book entitled Understanding Amateur Radio.  In 1998,  NORCAL QRP redid the Herring Aid 5.  Incredibly, THEY INCLUDED THE OFFENDING CAPACITOR in their new and improved schematic.  

NORCAL's 1998 Schematic included C14

I'm fixing up this old receiver a bit.  It was nice to have it playing 40 meter CW yesterday.  Better late than never.  

This morning I was feeling kind of guilty about paying so much attention to a receiver from 1976.  But then I opened the paper and read about the recent find of a DeLorean car.  Heck if a DeLorean from the early 80's is worthy of attention, so is a homebrew receiver from the late 1970s. 

Wednesday, October 18, 2023

A Big Error Discovered in the 1976 QST "Herring Aid 5" Article (After 47 Years)

Click on image for a better view.  See arrows for Q1, Q5 and the parts list.

I tried as a teenager to build the Herring Aid 5 direct conversion receiver from the July 1976 issue of QST.  I could not get it to work. Important points: 1) I was attracted to the fact that this receiver used only parts available from local Radio Shack stores (I bought them) and 2) The article provided a PC board pattern (I also bought ferric chloride and etched a board). 

Looking back, I concluded that I had failed to get the VFO to oscillate.  I remember hearing signals when I tuned my HT-37 transmitter (on Cal, on 40) near the receiver.  I was very close, but I never got that Herring Aid 5 VFO to oscillate.

Thirty-eight years later I tried again to build the receiver.  Important points:  This time I used mostly junk box parts and Manhattan-style construction (no etching).  Still I could not get the VFO to work.  ZL2DEX spotted a problem -- I had wound the L6 and L7 coils with the wrong "winding sense."  I corrected this, and BOOM! the VFO sprang to life.  I assumed that I had made a similar "winding sense error" way back in 1976.  This, I thought, explained my failure to get the receiver working.  The QST article had warned that proper phasing of L6 and L7 was necessary.  I figured that I just hadn't fully understood what "proper phasing" meant.  So it was, I thought, all my fault.    

 
Here is the PC board pattern from QST.  Arrows show Q1 (DGS) and Q5 (DSG).  
But it is the same kind of FET!  Click on the image for a better view.

But then on October 17, 2023 a comment appeared on the SolderSmoke YouTube channel.  Rick WD5L had also -- back in the late 70's -- tried to build this receiver.  He recently looked closely at the recommended parts list (that we used!) and at the QST PC board pattern (that we also used). AND HE SPOTTED AN IMPORTANT ERROR IN THE QST PC BOARD PATTERN.   

Take a look at the pattern for Q5 above (see arrow).  That is the VFO FET.  A Radio Shack 2035 FET has a DGS pinout (see below).   The Gate is the center pin.  If you put this transistor into the PC board pattern above you would definitely be grounding the Gate.  There is no way the VFO would work under these circumstances.  Note too that the only other RS 2035 FET in the receiver is Q1 (the RF amplifier).  In the PC board pattern above Q1 is marked correctly as DGS.  This confirms the error in the Q5 PC board pattern.  There is no way an RS 2035 transistor can simultaneously have two different pinouts! 

Wow.  So this failure to get the VFO working may not have been my fault after all.  I may have actually gotten the transformer winding correct, but even if I did, there is no way this VFO would have worked using the part called for by QST and the PC board pattern shown above.  As a teenager I just did not know enough to spot the error or the inconsistency.  I kind put blind trust in QST.  I just couldn't get the thing to work.  

Rick searched the QST archives to see if they ever put out an errata on this.  So far, nothing. Worse yet, the scan of the PC board pattern on the QST site is very unclear and may have the pin designations on Q5 scratched out. This would make it more difficult to spot the problem.  (The image above is not from ARRL.  It is from a high quality scan of the original QST article done this week by a fellow Vienna Wireless Society member.)  Please let us know if you find any kind of errata or any acknowledgment of error.  

This is really pretty bad.  This was a project aimed at novices.  Far from encouraging homebrewing, this type of mistake is the kind of thing that would push people away from the soldering iron.  

Ironically, I may have been doomed by opting to use the QST PC board.  If I had used Manhattan-style construction (as I did in my more recent build) I would not have fallen victim to this PC board pattern error.  Also, if I had built this thing stage-by-stage (as we always now recommend) I would have more clearly realized (back in 1976) that the problem was in the VFO stage.  But I was 17 and didn't know.  I put blind faith in the QST article.  It never occurred to me that something in print could be wrong.  This realization came much later. 




There is more to talk about on this ill-fated project. In future posts I will discuss another error, this one in the AF amplifier.  And possible additional errors...  And I'll write about the 1998 resurrection of this project by NORCAL QRP and the New Jersey QRP clubs.  

Thanks to Rick WD5L for spotting the PC board error. 

Designer: Douglas Bowman | Dimodifikasi oleh Abdul Munir Original Posting Rounders 3 Column