Why is AM on 3885 kHz?

It is Saturday morning, 0500 EDT.  I am tuned to 3885 kHz, listening to the Old Military Radio Net.  It is on 3885 kHz.  Why this frequency? 

Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCR-536

Gemini explains: 

The frequency 3885 kHz is inextricably tied to one of the most iconic military radios of World War II: the BC-611 Handie-Talkie (part of the SCR-536 radio set).

Manufactured by Galvin Manufacturing Corporation (which later became Motorola), the BC-611 was the world’s first ubiquitous handheld, two-way AM transceiver. It was the "walkie-talkie" you see clamped to the ears of infantrymen in every classic WWII movie.

The technical marriage between this specific radio and 3885 kHz came down to how the military deployed them and what happened immediately after the war:

1. The Channels Were Commandeered

The BC-611 could operate anywhere from 3.5 to 6.0 MHz by swapping out internal plug-in coils and quartz crystals. Because the U.S. government temporarily shut down all civilian amateur radio operations "for the duration" of WWII, the military freely assigned tactical frequencies right inside what used to be the ham bands.

For company and platoon-level communications, 3885 kHz became a standard assigned military channel.

2. The Great Surplus Avalanche

When WWII ended, the military had hundreds of thousands of BC-611 units, along with mountains of spare FT-243 crystal units, sitting in warehouses. The government liquidated them to the civilian market for pennies on the dollar.

Hams returning from the war snapped them up. Because these units were strictly crystal-controlled (you couldn't just spin a dial to change frequency), you were locked onto whatever crystal was inside. Since a massive portion of the surplus BC-611 inventory came pre-installed with the military's 3885 kHz crystal and tank coil, thousands of hams suddenly possessed portable AM rigs fixed precisely to that exact spot on the dial.

3. A Lasting Living Tradition

Even though a BC-611 only pushed out a fraction of a watt of AM power (using a tube filament battery and a 108-volt B+ battery), hams quickly realized that if they gathered on 3885 kHz, they could hear each other locally. Operators with larger, higher-powered home stations began parking on 3885 kHz as well, just to act as "big ears" to pick up the faint signals of the handheld walkie-talkies.

That specific frequency choice was entirely forged in the surplus markets of 1945 and 1946. Eighty years later, the tradition is so deeply ingrained that military radio collectors and vintage AM operators still hold a massive, synchronized check-in on 3885 kHz every year during the Dayton Hamvention weekend.

Jim Tonne -- W4ENE -- SK -- Does anyone have his 2012 Envelope Demodulator Article?

 

Some sad new arrived this morning via QRZ.com and the AM Window:   Jim Tonne W4ENE has passed away: 

https://www.legacy.com/us/obituaries/name/james-tonne-obituary?id=59587279

https://forums.qrz.com/index.php?threads/jim-tonne-w4ene-sk.969255/

Jim was a prolific software developer for radio amateurs.  He was the source of the Elsie program used by so many of us. 

I had a very useful e-mail exchange with Jim in 2022 about envelope detectors.  Much of the exchange was about a 2012 article that Jim wrote on this subject.  I was looking for it just today.  Unfortunately Jim's software business (and his websites) are all apparently tied up with the executor.  I can't access them. 

Does anyone out there have a downloaded copy of Jim's 2012 article on Envelope Demodulators that they could send to me? 

http://www.tonnesoftware.com/appnotes/demodulator/EnvelopeDemodulators.pdf

It is a tribute to the contributions made by a radio amateur that even after his passing people are scrambling to find his articles and his software.   Condolences to Jim's family. 

Does a simple, single diode envelope detector function the same way as a product detector does?

Mike WU2D has an interesting series of videos on the simple detectors used in crystal radios.  Mike's videos touch on a discussion that I had a few years ago with a member of the Vienna Wireless Association.  I was describing how an envelope detector uses rectification to recover (demodulate) the audio from an AM signal.  The club member dismissed this explanation and claimed that what really happens is that the diode simply mixes the carrier and the sidebands to produce audio.  He claimed that the rectification "theory" was just a fable created to deal with people who really didn't know how mixers worked.  See:   https://soldersmoke.blogspot.com/2022/12/is-envelope-detection-fable-or-is-it.html

I was kind of disappointed by Mike's videos.  He seemed to take an agonostic position on this issue.  He framed it as "some people believe in the rectification explanation, and some people believe in the product detection explanation." As if both explanations are equally valid.  They are not. 

This morning, I asked AI about the two explanations.  Here is what AI says: 

 Does a simple, single diode envelope detector function the same way as a product detector does? 

AI Overview

No, a single diode envelope detector does not function the same way as a product detector because the envelope detector is a non-linear circuit that recovers the audio from a full amplitude-modulated (AM) signal by following its envelope, while a product detector is a linear mixer that recovers the audio from various modulated signals (including DSB-SC and SSB) by multiplying the modulated signal with a local oscillator. Product detectors are more versatile and offer better signal quality than simple envelope detectors, which are limited to demodulating DSB-AM signals with a full carrier. 

I know that AI sometimes gets it wrong, but I think that on this one, it has it right. 

I don't think it is necessary to include discussion of modulation percentages nor diode biasing to clearly explain what is going on. 

Even if you are using a very weak signal and are completely in the square law region of the characteristic curve,  you are still essentially dealing with a form of rectification:  portions of the signal on the positive side of the curve will experience less attenuation than signals on the negative portion of the input curve.

When we use a crystal receiver, we are relying on the rectification done by the diode -- even if the rectification happens in the square law region.  After the crystal there is some low pass filtering.  The envelope of the AM signal remains and this is the audio signal that we listen to.  That is why we call it -- correctly -- an envelope detector.   And as the AI says, an envelope detector funcions differently than a product detector. 

Checking in to the Old Military Radio Net, March 29, 2025

This was a fairly typical session of the Old Military Radio Net. 3885 kHz AM 0500 local on Saturday mornings. (Distant listeners can tune in via WebSDR.) This clip shows W3EMD, N2CQR (me) and, N1SNG. Buzz W3EMD from the Hudson Valley of New York was on with his KWM-1. Normally he uses a BC-348 powered with a Dynamotor. Last week he told the group that someone had COMPLAINED about the noise that his mic was picking up from the Dynamotor. Geez! I told Buzz that we had been commiserating with him about this on the SolderSmoke podcast. Later in this morning's session I heard WU2D, WA1HLR, AJ1G, and others. I reported on an emergency De-Oxit spraying of my HQ-100's band switch, just minutes before net call up. I also noted that I had found a crystal for 3885 kHz; the radio gods have spoken (TRGHS).

Tapesponding -- Who Knew?

I didn't realize that "tapesponding" had become so widespread.  I know of two very prominent homebrewers (one now a Silent Key) who exchanged tapes.  When I learned of this I asked if those tapes (which would have been a real treasure) were still around.  Sadly, they had been destroyed,  as, I suspect, were most of the tapes mentioned in this video. 

I sometimes think that some of the on-the-air conversations about tech topics really should be saved for posterity (most conversations clearly should NOT be saved!).  The internet provides a great forum for this kind of preservation.  This happens,  but only very sporadically and mostly in the AM world. 

Thanks to Hack-A-Day for alerting us to this. 

Heard on the Old Military Radio Net: W4SVA

 

So there I was, early Saturday morning (earlier here -- we are one hour ahead of the East Coast) listening -- as I do -- to the Old Military Radio net.  3385 kHz  AM. I use the K3FEF Web SDR in Pennsylvania.  I heard a station that sounded familiar: Chris W4SVA.  He said he was in the Shenandoah valley and was receiving on an R-390A and transmitting with a homebrew rig.  I kind of remembered talking to a guy with a station like that.  I searched through the SolderSmoke blog.  No joy.  Then I remembered it was probably a log entry.  There he is, W4SVA.  Here is his QRZ page:  https://www.qrz.com/db/W4SVA  I was almost certainly on the K2ZA DX-100.  

Here's my log entry:  

------------------

12 August 2018

75AM W4SVA Chris in the Shenandoah, 15 miles south of Harrisonburg.  Very FB.  AM guy.  Building rack-mount rig.  Lots of HB stuff.  Sent him the Shenandoah rocket pictures.

--------------------

I also heard Buzz W3EMD from the Hudson Valley -- the dynamotor was clearly audible. FB Buzz. 

Thanks Chris. And thanks again to John Zaruba for the DX-100.

Mr. Carlson Restores a BC-348 -- But 40 Meters Sounds Very Weak. Why?

Mr. Carlson mentions that he is a ham radio AMer.  He is also on SSB, but AM is, he says, his preferred mode.  FB. 

I got a real chuckle about the MVC switch position on the front panel.  "Manual Volume Control"  like "Manual Gain Control."  I thought I had invented this term.  You know, "real hams control their gain manually."  This is why Farhan never put AGC in the BITX20. But it seems the Army Air Corps was way ahead of me with the BC-348.    

Mr. Carlson makes it sound (!) like the Dynamotors are a thing of the past.  Not true.  Every Saturday morning I listen to the Old Miltary Radio Net and hear a number of Dynamoters spinning in the background.  One belongs to Buzz W3EMB who uses a BC-348.  Buzz has an SDR attached to the IF of his BC-348, which I think is an admirable mix of the old and the new.  Those BC-348s are, after all, quite old.  WWII old -- like 85 years old.  And still working.  

Paul has a good discussion of the importance of short lead length, and of mounting shielded capacitors properly, and of the usefullness of a good groundplane under the capacitor.  Go Manhattan boards!  Paul's presentation on how to identify the outside foil of a capacitor was very good, but I was wondering if you could also find out by using a file to remove some of the yellow insulation, then test with a DMM to see which terminal is connected to the foil. 

"Lots of times you have to add solder to remove solder."  Indeed. 

The importance of testing for BOTH capacitance and leakage.  Yes. 

But why bother with "period correct" internal wiring harnesses, when you have already put a bunch of modern caps in there?   I mean, I'm in favor of the re-capping, but this seems inconsistent with the need for "period correct" internal wiring harnesses. 

When Paul first fired up the receiver, I was hoping he would disconnect the antenna to see how much band noise was getting through. 

When Paul got to the IF alignment, he spoke of the dangers of working on energized high-voltage gear.  I had been thinking about getting a BC-348 myelf, but Paul's comments reminded me of why this is probably not a good idea for me.  Paul's comments about "knowing where your hands are" is on target.  "One hand behind the back, " is a good rule for this kind of energized testing -- this will help prevent current from a mishap from flowing through your chest.  

I may have more comments later.  Off to the beach now.  

Back from the beach:   

"Contrary to popular belief, the simpler the receiver, the better they hear."  Amen Mr. C. 

Paul's heroic cleaning of the 915 kc crystal made me feel like a wimp for not having tried to do this with some "bad" 455 kc rocks I was given while trying to build the Mate for the Mighty Midget receiver.  I may go back to those crystals and try to clean them as Mr. C did. 

The grand finale of this 2.5 hour video was, as expected, a demonstration of how good it sounds.  But unfortunately it did not sound good.  Paul tuned through the 40 meter band and I heard NO CW signals.  I didn't even hear FT8.   There were a few anemic SSB signals and, as he reached the upper portion of the band some very weak AM broadcast signals.  I didn't even hear CHU Canada's time signal.  Huh?  Why?   Our very simple homebrew Direct Conversion receiver sounds a LOT better than that.  I mean look at the sweep of 40 meters that I did using only a simple dipole:  https://soldersmoke.blogspot.com/2024/12/an-evening-bandscan-on-40-meters-using.html  Why is there such a big difference in performance? 

Could it be the antenna that Paul was using?   He was on what he calls the 369 antenna.   Could there be a problem in the receiver?  Could it be band conditions?   

USAF Video: Why SSB is Superior to Ordinary AM

OK, the title of this blog post has an element of click bait in it.  Just this morning I was listening to the Old Military Radio Net on 3885 AM.  I'm sure some of those guys would disagree with the assertion that SSB is better than AM.  But I think this old Air Traffic Command video lays it out very well.  

I kind wish they had dicussed Double Sideband, Suppressed Carrier transmission.  

I wonder want the year of production of this video was.  Does anybody know?

For the record:  I am the owner of a DX-40, a DX-60, and a DX-100.  I also am on 10 meter AM with a converted CB rig.   So I have transmitted both sidebands, and the carrier.  

 

First 10 Meter AM Contact from Hi7/N2CQR

I threw this in the bag on the way to the DR, almost as an afterthought.  But I am glad I did.  Today, watching reports on my 10 meter CW beacon (Mike WN2A provided the keyer),  I noticed that my signal was unusually strong.  At W3POA I was 7 db above the noise.  At DF2CK I was 4 db above the noise.  So I switched to the 10 meter AM rig (which is a converted GE brand CB rig) and worked John G3YPZ (see video above).   I was running about 5 watts to a quarter wave vertical.  But the signal reached the UK. 

Here are some details on my rig: 

https://soldersmoke.blogspot.com/2025/01/looking-for-contacts-on-10-meter-am.html

And https://soldersmoke.blogspot.com/2023/11/bill-n2cqr-goes-citizen-band.html

Thanks John!  

Looking for Contacts on 10 meter AM from the Dominican Republic -- 29.005 MHz AM

I was listening to the Old Military Radio Net this morning and I heard Tim WA1HLR talking about some contacts that he had made on 10 meters, near 29 MHz.  So I pulled my modified CB rig off the shelf, connected a power supply and my 10 meter vertical, and began to listen.  Soon I heard CQs!  One from G4ITR and then one from  G4VZR.  I now have high hopes for at least one QSO.  So please, point those ten meter beams at the Dominican Republic and give me a call.  I am on 29.005 Mhz.  

73  Bill HI7/N2CQR

Jean Shepherd has Trouble with his Heising Modulator (and his date)

This is probably Jean Shepherd's best program about homebrew ham radio.  It is about how we can become obsessed with the problems that arise with equipment that we have built ourselves, and how normal people cannot understand our obsessions.   

I posted about this back in 2008, but I was listening to it again today, and quickly realized that it is worth re-posting.   Realize that Shepherd's Heising modulation problems happened almost 90 years ago.  But the same kind of obsession affect the homebrewers of today.  

Note too how Shepherd talks about "Heising" in Heising modulation.  Heising has an entire circuit named for him, just like Hartley, Colpitts, and Pierce of oscillator fame.  Sometimes, when I tell another ham that my rig is homebrew, I get a kind of snide, snarky, loaded question:  "Well, did you DESIGN it yourself?"  This seems to be a way for appliance operators to deal with the fact that while they never build anything, someone else out there does melt solder.  They seem to think that the fact that you did not design the rig yourself makes your accomplishment less impressive, less threatening.  This week I responded to this question with Shepherd's observation -- I told the enquiring ham that my rig is in fact homebrewed, but that I had not invented the Colpitts oscillator, nor the common emitter amplifier, not the diode ring mixer, nor the low-pass filter.  But yes, the rig is homebrew, as was Shepherd's Heising modulator.    

Guys, stop what you are doing. Put down that soldering iron, or that cold Miller High Life ("the champagne of bottled beer") and click on the link below. You will be transported back to 1965 (and 1934!), and will hear master story-teller Jean Shepherd (K2ORS) describing his teenage case of The Knack. He discusses his efforts to build a Heising modulated transmitter for 160 meters. He had trouble getting it working, and became obsessed with the problem, obsessed to the point that a girl he was dating concluded that there was "something wrong with him" and that his mother "should take him to a doctor."

This one is REALLY good. It takes him a few minutes to get to the radio stuff, but it is worth the wait. More to follow. EXCELSIOR! FLICK LIVES!

Listen here:  

http://ia310115.us.archive.org/2/items/JeanShepherd1965Pt1/1965_01_29_Ham_Radio.mp3

Listen to this great contact with KA1BWO on 10 meter AM -- 1800 miles with 4 watts AM

Joe KA1BWO is a well-known AM operator who moved West to Idaho several years ago. We had a very nice contact on 10 meter AM on January 14, 2024.  See the video above. 

I was using an old CB rig that I had converted to legitimacy on 10 meters using the mod developed by Jerry K5JC:  

http://www.jcoffman.net/WB5RUA/10_meter_AM_conversion_w_Photos.html

I was running 4 watts on AM to a Hex beam. The signal path was over 1800 miles from Virginia to Idaho.

1000 Mile QSO with KC5U using Modified CB Rigs (video)

Eldon KC5U saw my blog posts about Jerry K5JC’s mods to the PLL02 CB rigs.

Here is the mod: http://www.jcoffman.net/WB5RUA/10_meter_AM_conversion_w_Photos.html

Eldon did the mod and we have been trying to make contact. We did so today. It was very cool. I was on my GE rig; Eldon was running a JC Penny! (See video above.) 1054 miles. Thanks Eldon. And thanks Jerry!

On my Second Day on 10 meter AM, I Worked K5JC -- the Creator of the Mod that I was Using (Video)

See video above.  This happened on my second day on 10 meter AM. I was using the little GE CB radio that I had modified for 10 meters. I had lucked out. First bit of luck: the CB that I bought (for parts!) at a hamfest turned out to be just the thing I needed for a quick and easy mod. The GE box had what is called a Hygain board and -- most important -- a PLL02 chip. Second bit of luck: I stumbled across an article by Jerry K5JC on how to put this particular kind of device onto 10 meter AM. Boom, Bob was my uncle, and I got on 10. Then, today, the miracle happened. I heard Benny K5KV and I gave him a call. He asked about my rig. I described the mod to the GE CB. Benny seemed kind of surprised, and for good reason. You see, Jerry K5JC (the guy who created the mod that I was using) had just broken squelch on Benny's rig! Benny told him to get on 10 and soon I as in contact with the guy who had created the mod that I was using. The Radio Gods Have Spoken. Thanks Benny and thanks a Jerry. This was all really cool.

Think of odds of this happening: On my second day on 10 AM, running just 4 watts, I just happened to contact Benny K5KV in Texas who just happened to be in 2 meter range of Jerry K5JC, who just happened at that moment to be breaking squelch on Benny's 2 meter rig. TRGHS.

Bill N2CQR Goes Citizen Band

 10-4 Good Buddies! 

Ciprian YO6DXE Puts the Michigan Mighty Mite on AM! (video)

Excellent work Ciprian!  

Here we have a Michigan Mighty Mite being modified for AM in Romania, with input from Hungary, and inspiration from Melbourne, Australia (Peter Parker VK3YE).  With a very nice shout-out to SolderSmoke.  

I really like Ciprian's emphasis on having fun with the electronics. 

TRGHS! 

Helge LA6NCA Builds a Double Sideband Thermatron Transmitter

Helge is an amazing homebrewer. Check out the shack.  Note the R-390 and the Tek 'scope.  Watch how Helge designs his rig.  Watch him check the 3-D printed coil and the variable caps for resonance.  Most of all, watch his happiness when the new transmitter works.  I just wish he would have showed us some OM complaining that he was on the "wrong" sideband. FB Helge!  Thanks. 

Homebrew AM from Cuba

Jose CO6EC sent us more information about homebrew rigs built in Cuba.  The transmitter above is a thing of beauty.   I am really glad that Jose has held on to it.  Thanks Jose! 

Jose CO6EC today

Jose CO6EC writes: 

This is another work from that time:  an AM and CW transmitter of about 100W of power, with an on-board modulator.  It was taken with some modifications from a Handbook from the 50s.  Here goes:  it was built with what we had on hand at that time, it still exists, I keep it as a relic of those years.

It used combined Soviet and American tubes in the RF sections:  Soviet 6P9 and (2) 6146.   The modulator used Soviet 12AX7, 12AUT and (2) 6P7. The 6P9 works as a crystal oscillator, and in  case of using an external VFO it works as an amplifier and doubler or tripler to obtain outputs in the  160,80,40,20,15 and 10 Meter bands. 

The VFO was also taken from a 1949 Handbook if I remember correctly, but I don't have any literature on that, as you can see in the photo it has 5 5u4c rectifier valves, VR150 voltage stabilizer, 6v6 output, another 6v6 as a separator and a 6 )I(4 (60I94?) Soviet, in the oscillator.  The stability they achieved in those years is incredible,  I could communicate with stations that were on LSB and if I didn't tell them that I was on AM they didn't notice. 

  As a receiver I used an old   Soviet AM and CW receiver, used by the Aviation HF stations   of the 40s, which no longer exists hihihihihi

I'll tell you how I tuned all that good ftuff:  First I put the receiver  in CW to beat the signal of the stations in SSB.  After hearing them clearly, I removed the oscillator of the receiver  and connected only the VFO of the Transmitter, and beat the signal with that of the receiver until I heard the other station  clearly, then I put the transmitter to work and was ready to communicate.

There were many communications made with that station, even internationally on phone  and CW. 

Today everything is easier because with transceivers it is not necessary to go through all that work, but it is always good that those who did all this work know how radio was built and made.

 73   Jose CO6EC

Obviously the transmitter

The two pictures above must be the VFO.  It looks like the VFO in the 1947 ARRL Handbook. 

I wonder what handbook this was?  Spanish language. 

More Cuban Homebrew from the 80's and 90's -- A 160 Meter AM (Controlled Carrier) TX with Soviet 6P23s

 

160 Meter Transmitter

Jose CO6EC writes: 

I will be sending you some work of homebrew from the 80's and 90's when practically everything was manufactured by Cuban radio amateurs

The photos are of a Modulated Amplitude TX for the 160 Meter Band, about 25W of which several were made.  The final tube  was modulated in many cases by a 6DQ6, 2E26 or other similar ones that were very abundant at that time. 

This one in particular is  made with valves  6BH6 for the VFO, 6CL6 for the amplifier step and 6P23 Soviets in the final part, the modulator was made up of a 12Ax7 microphone preamplifier and a 6BM8 that came out through the cathode to the screen grid of the 6P23, in this way the carrier was controlled by modulation what we called  Carrier Control as there was no voltage on the grid at the ends there was practically no carrier  in the air which gave the impression of transmitting in SSB. hihihihihihi

For those who did not have a communications receiver, a conventional radio was adapted to receive that band, which in many cases was a VEF-206 of Soviet construction, to which an oscillator was adapted to beat the signal and get exactly on frequency. This was very popular here in the late 80's and early 90's. 

Thanks Jose.  We look forward to learning more about Cuban homebrew. The way in which radio amateurs got on the air with gear that they made themselves using the limited parts available to them is really interesting and admirable. 73  Bill 

The Islander -- A Homebrew DSB Rig from Cuba

 

This article, the pictures, and the comments are all so cool. They really capture the spirit of homebrew. Obviously we still need more information on  the Islander and the Jaguey.  If you have it, please send it to me and I will disseminate it via this blog. 

From: https://www.frcuba.cu/filiales-grupos/villa-clara/contra-el-olvido.html  with translation by Google.  

I've been in touch by e-mail with Jose Campos CO6EC (the guy in the picture above).   He sent me this partial schematic of the Islander (we still need the VFO circuit and the RF amplifier) .  Thanks Jose! 

Published: 06 August 2018

Views: 2274

Comments: 6

Remembering

By José de Jesús Enríquez Campos (CO6EC)

Next 2019 will be the 30th anniversary of the first convention of radio amateurs in the province of Villa Clara, in Campismo de Ganuza, municipality of Corralillo, on the North coast, about 100 kilometers from Santa Clara, the provincial capital.

This convention was held on a national basis and colleagues from all the country's provinces participated at that time. We did not reach a thousand members throughout the national territory and most of the radio amateurs worked in the 40-meter Band in Amplitude Modulation Then the Lateral Side Band (SSB) was the privilege of a few and the 2 meters was something rare, which did not yet exist in our environment.

At that meeting, a project for a Tube Transceiver was presented, quite simple, with just six vacuum tubes and a BF310 transistor. It was possible to work in HF in Double Sideband, achieving a greater efficiency than the transmission in Modulated Amplitude (AM). This project became known as the Islander.

In only two printed plates, one for the VFO and another for the TX and RX part, which by the way were printed for distribution, in a company in Villa Clara, due to their easy construction and acquisition of the components (almost all of them came out of a Krin-218 TV), a large number of such equipment were manufactured by radio amateurs from all over the country. Like everything made at home, it always comes up with a little problem that later is necessary with tinkering, correcting it.

I remember listening to an old radio amateur from Havana (whose callsign I don't remember) in a pleasant QSO with another colleague, who jokingly said, "... some "Bugs" have now appeared in the band, called Islander, which is worse than the invasion of the Vikings…”, which gives an idea of ​​how many were built at that time, when if you wanted to make radio, you had to manufacture it, something unusual in these times.

As soon as we saw the project we decided to build it, because at that time we had an AM “transmitter” with modulation by “Carrier control” with four tubes, a 12AX7 preamplifier; an ECL82, as a modulator, with cathode output to the final tube Screen grid, a 6DQ6 and a 6BH6 as VFO; and to receive, an old Russian receiver from World War II.
 
 We got involved in the construction and improvements of the project and we managed, with some changes, to improve its performance and quality, because among the modifications to the original, we added: 

 -A switch, with which you could change the transmission mode to DSB -CW-AM.
-A "Pi" Filter at the input of the RX, which considerably improved its quality.
-An automatic volume control, because since it did not have AGC (Automatic Gain Control), when someone nearby came on, it would break your speaker.
-A filter for the microphone input, which improved the quality of the modulation.
-A final power stage, with a 6146B, with 750 V on the board, for about 70 W of  output, taking advantage of the 6P15P as Driver.
-The chassis was built from scratch using aluminum trays that were sold at the hardware store for “four pesos” each and that were special for making cabinets for these purposes.

After the construction was completed in one afternoon, with Reinaldo Martínez Domínguez (CO6UK), from Manicaragua, the balanced modulator was adjusted, since the good transmission of this type of equipment depends on the relationship between the amount of RF and audio that are mixed At that stage, it took us a long time to adjust, until Reinaldo with his expert ear told me, “leave it there, don't touch it, it's 99% complete”.

There were many international contacts that I was able to make with this very simple equipment, with very good reports, many of them with Europe, the American continent, that was very normal, since the propagation conditions in those years had nothing to do with the today, you could do half the world in AM, with about 100 W.
 
Many colleagues at that time asked me what equipment I was using.  When I told them it was an Islander, they asked me to send them the plans of the improvements made, they were many modified plans, mimeographed.
 
Perhaps the youngest do not know what that was and the photos taken by colleague Joel (CO6JC) that helped to illustrate the distribution of the components in the chassis, were sent to radio amateurs from the different provinces, in the interest of contributing modestly to migrate from AM to the Double Side Band, today it is a rarity to listen to someone on AM, there are already few who appear in Double Side Band, which shows that we have developed in these almost 30 years, despite the difficulties, which We went from just under a thousand to about 8,000 throughout the country today.

From time to time, a colleague in the 40 meter Band, from another province, has told me that he still keeps the plans and photos that were sent to him at that time, or as "Kike" (CO6GO) that he still has a Islander as a relic.

Ours passed away a long time ago and part of its components went to other projects, thanks to Joel (CO6JC) there is a graphic record of it, and that at that time I had hair, which I have lost in these bustles.
 
With this brief comment, we only want the new generations to know what radio amateurs were like in those days and the older ones to remember it.

Nothing, to remember is to live again.

Here he left you some images.

• (co6ec) Jose de Jesus Enriquez Campos

  Monday, 06 August 2018 19:30

  The first Image was the prototype presented at the Ganuza meeting, the rest of the photos were the ones we built with the improvements, and the photos and plans were sent to many colleagues, the colleagues who went to that meeting will remember, well, they still have to there are many left, because that was almost 30 years ago,
  greetings CO6EC

• (co8zz) Raul Verdecie

  Monday, August 06, 2018 23:12

  Magnificent photographs!!!... They seem to have been taken today with some digital "super camera"!!!
  Really, from what I can see now, the CO6EC Islander was the perfect example... mine (my first radio and built by me) was also made like this, with the plates that the FRC sold and it was good, but very ugly ...HI... The AGC worked wonderfully as it came, I don't know if Jose's improvements were later! With it I made my first hundred or so entities only in 40 meters / CW (between 7,100 and 7,150) when it was CL8ZZ. I gave it away so that someone would have their license and now I regret not having kept it... I would have liked to show it now to those who regret not having a radio!!!

• (co8zz) Raul Verdecie

  Monday, August 06, 2018 23:43

  Ah, I can never forget those headphones!!!... my external hearing aids (read ears) are much smaller today thanks to them, they exerted tons of force on the operators' skulls!!!

• (cm6vml) Vidal

  Tuesday, August 07, 2018 23:40

  Very good article, I hope that one day, with a good teacher, I can build my own team, congratulations Jose, regards Vidal.

• (co7wt) Pavel Milanes (CO7WT)

  Wednesday, August 08, 2018 09:52

  Sure...
  
  My first radio and with which I got my CL7WT license back in the 90's an ISLANDER, like that in capital letters.
  
  I remember that the CL only had a small 40m segment (like now) and that it was full of broadcasts as soon as the afternoon fell, it was an odyssey to speak on the radio... you had to find a "little hole" between the Broadcastings where it wouldn't bother you " a lot" to be able to talk.
  
  I remember that the old CO7OC (he is no longer a radio amateur) and CL7HU (now AC7HU) helped me build it with a board I bought at the radio club. I took almost all the valves from the deceased KRIM 218, then I found a store in Camagüey that sold idle things from the workshops...
  
  Turns out they had such a large inventory of "idle" tubes that they couldn't put it on the counter...they let me through to the warehouse...huge...stack of tubes, if I remember correctly I ended up with Chinese or Japanese tubes that they were more sensitive in the receiver... the driver went from a 6P14P to a more robust 6P9, by the end that was a humble 6P44 it became two 6P7s that were a Russian version of the RCA 607 if I remember correctly... in the end it had like 80W.
  
  It goes without saying that when I said on the radio that there were valves in that place "they flew"....
  
  The VFO was the one from the Jagüey, not the original from the Islander, I never knew about the AGC modifications.
  
  I would like if someone has the plans with the modifications to send them to me, just for nostalgia...
  
  My email pavelmc@gmail.com
  

• (co2jc) Carlos Alberto Santamaría González

  Monday, August 13, 2018 00:21

  Brother, your article is very good, because of the nostalgia and also because it talks about what we radio amateurs like: tinkering. I didn't have an Islander because what I started with in 2000 was a Polosa to which two colleagues helped me adapt it with VFO for 40 and 80 m. But I talked a lot with colleagues who did it with an Islander or a Jagüey and participated in the Rueda del Behique that I started in the 80 m. Others in the Hurricane Wheel that started a little later and were heard well. As you well say, the propagation at that time had nothing to do with what it is now, but it was very good to listen to the colleagues who came out with the equipment they had built. Thank you once again for your article. CO2JC