SolderSmoke Daily News
Serving the worldwide community of radio-electronic homebrewers. Providing blog support to the SolderSmoke podcast: http://soldersmoke.com
Podcasting since August 2005! Listen to Latest SolderSmoke
Saturday, October 10, 2026
CuriousMarc and Company Fix an Old Analog Device (an Apollo Hand Controller)
Thursday, October 8, 2026
Wednesday, October 7, 2026
About the Guy Who Brought Us the AADE L/C Meter -- Neil W. Heckt
Memories of Neil W. Heckt
My work with Tobias (KK7BCO/2M0TFF) on a LC meter as the fifth build in Red Summit RF's Homebrew Workbench series for beginners introduced me to the clever LC meter design of Neil Heckt. As we celebrate his work by building one ourselves, in this post I hope to celebrate his life through the memories of those who knew him.
Neils's AADE L/C Meter IIB was a great hit, with thousands of units sold both as kits and as fully assembled instruments. It is not difficult to find praise for the meter. Many owners have written about its accuracy, usefullness, limitations, and clever design. Scattered among those reviews, however, are also small glimpses of Neil himself—stories from people who corresponded with him, asked him for help, or sent their meters back to him for repair. The reviews of the AADE L/C Meter IIB on eHam.net are particularly valuable in this respect. Many are written by people who dealt with Neil directly, and aongside their praise for the meter they remembered his kindness, honesty, and unusually generous customer service.
Memories
There is surprisingly little written about the man behind the instrument. While trying to learn more about him, I found most of the biographical information in his obituary. While searching further, I came across a moving remembrance titled Celebrate the Sun, written by Jill L. Ferguson, Neil's daughter-in-law. It offered something quite different from the technical accounts and product reviews: a glimpse of Neil as a husband, father, and person. One story in particular reveals a wonderfully personal side of him:
She (Kay) said her favorite book and life philosophy came from Celebrate the Sun. Back before she and Neil dated she had told him about this book. Not only did he borrow her copy and read it, but he photocopied the whole thing and pasted page by page into a photo album and intermixed the pages with his own photographs of the sun, of himself on hikes, and of the two of them walking in the woods. He decorated the front of the book with black electrical tape and two die-cut pelicans as they are key characters in the book. After Neil and Kay moved in together and married, she found this book he had created but had never told her about. She intimated that part of the way she knew he was the man for her was because he had taken her interest in this book so seriously. On his last night, she had the book Neil had created with them in hospice center and was reading the end of it to him shortly before his passed.
I was deeply moved by the story and wrote to Jill to ask whether she might be willing to share a few more memories of Neil, and perhaps a photograph. She kindly replied that she would speak with Kay, Neil's wife, and with Neil's son, her husband.
Two days later, I received a message containing a wonderful remembrance written by Kay herself, together with a photograph of Neil as a younger man. I have reproduced both here.

Photograph of Young Neil, thanks to Jill, sent to me by Kay.
Neil Heckt worked for the Boeing Company for more than 30 years. He was a member of their early air and space team. In his earliest years he worked on getting satellites into orbit and later getting men onto the moon. He developed his first inventions during those years which, of course, were owned by Boeing.
When we met he was a few short years from retirement. He was anxious to start his own business and create new products unrelated to his work at Boeing. He named his company Almost All Digital Electronics.
The inventions that followed seemed focused on developing ways to measure very, small units of...? He invented an atomic clock. It is my understanding that the Bureau of Weights and Standards in Colorado used it and that it was displayed there. Here I must state that I am woefully unknowledgable about any aspects of his work. I am neither a business woman or an inventor so, though I found him brilliant I rarely understood what his inventions really did. We were very different in many ways but genuinely admired each other's talents.
The last invention was an L/C Meter kit for hobbyists. He did very well with that product. The arrival of the internet and eBay made it a commercial success.
I thought his philosophy about not patenting his products was unusual. He told me that he developed a product, sold as many as he could and when someone copied his work he would stop production and leaveit to someone else to deal with it while he invented something else.
He had talents and ideas brewing in his brain that craved to be made real. He told me that whenever he needed money he would invent something that people would buy and then he paid his bills.
He wasn't like me and the people in my world who took on a second or third job when we needed money. I found his confidence and creativity to be amazing!
Neil was scrupulously honest in his business . Once he purchased two antique vacuum tubes for less than $100 from an eBay customer. When they arrived he discovered that they were quite valuable. He wrapped one tube up and sent it back to the customer with a note telling him what it was worth. Instead of selling it and making a good deal of money he sent it back. I asked him why. He said it wouldn't be fair to the seller for him to keep all of it for himself because the guy just didn't know what he had.
If anyone had a problem assembling one of his kits they sent them to him and he would fix their problems without charge.
Neil was sick for many years before his death. His brilliant mind was with him to the end.
I hope these memories help preserve not only Neil Heckt’s work, but also something of the thoughtful, generous, and inventive man remembered by those who knew him.
***
Tuesday, October 6, 2026
Some Useful Drake History from 15 years ago -- Thank you to Bob Crane W8SX
I stumbled upon this report on an interview that Bob Crane W8SX did with Bill Frost back in 2011. Bill had been Service Manager for Drake, and knew a lot about the 2-B. This interview is a reminder of the great info that Bob has brought to us over the years. Thanks Bob!
Especially interesting and useful were Bill's comments on crystal filters, the number of 2-Bs produced, and the rarity of the Q multiplier.
Check it out:
https://soldersmoke.blogspot.com/2011/05/w8sx-drake-interview.html
Sunday, October 4, 2026
Are we alone in the universe? How well have we checked so far? PLEASE COMMENT
I am a fan of Fraser Cain's. I encourage SolderSmoke listeners, readers, and viewers to check out his work: https://www.youtube.com/@frasercain
Having grown up with a steady stream of Carl Sagan ("billions and billions") and Star Trek, I naturally accepted that there must be some other intelligent civilizations out there. But maybe not. Lately I have been hearing from some very well informed people that we may be alone. This video explains why. It also has a lot of good information on how to carry our a Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence.
Please let me know what you think about all this.
Saturday, October 3, 2026
Helge LA6NCA Does It Again! This Time Homebrew CW Solid-State QRP.
Monday, September 28, 2026
SolderSmoke Direct Conversion Challenge: 139 Receivers Built
As of September 28, 2026 1248Z
So far, total receivers built: 139 (131 plus 8 honorable mentions). Total Count: 139. Receivers built in 19 countries.
This Guy Designed His Own Microprocessor Chip -- But Is This REALLY Design?
Sunday, September 27, 2026
The WN2QHL N2CQR Drake 2-B
I was telling Steve KW4H and Scott K6AUS about my Drake 2-B (Serial #11976):
I got mine when I was still a novice on April 11, 1974. I still have it and use it. It had been spared the Magic Screwdriver, because the previous owner was my Elmer, Hilmar WN2NEC. Hilmar was a no-nonsense German immigrant, a tech who knew which end of the soldering iron to grab.
Thursday, September 24, 2026
What Does It Mean when Someone Says "You Are 30 Hz Off Frequency"? And How Modern SDR Waterfalls Perpetuate this Myth -- The Rigid Stencil -- PLEASE COMMENT
Dean and Pete and I have been talking about this for some time. We are really trying to understand where this is coming from. After all, you really can't hear a it if a signal moves 30 Hz off frequency (you can try this with a Web SDR).
And how could they tell that I was 30 Hz off frequency? Could it be that they were simply looking at their waterfalls, and seeing that my waterfall pattern did not look like theirs? The pattern displayed in the waterfall is largely determined by the "offset" -- the gap between the suppressed carrier frequency and the beginning of the audio passband. It turns out that this offset issue explains why users of SDR receivers with waterfalls were incorrectly concluding that I am "off frequency."
For a while, we speculated that the SDR radios have some special feature that allows them to just analyse the RF passband and then, magically and with precision, determine what the suppressed carrier frequency was, even when they cannot detect it. As you do these days, I asked the LLMs about this. I use Gemini. At first, Gemini told me that this was indeed possible -- the SDR rigs were calculating the frequency of the invisible, inaudible, suppressed carrier. For a while I grudgingly accepted this. Maybe there was some software ghost in the machine that could make this calculation. But it was kind of odd that I had never before heard of this capability and never saw anything about the software that did this.
But in late September I asked Gemini again, and got the opposite answer. Here is what AI said in late September:
-----------------------------
It is mathematically impossible for an SDR to determine the precise suppressed carrier frequency from a voice passband alone.
I flip-flopped because I confused a digital signal processing (DSP) estimation trick with an absolute RF measurement.
Here is exactly where my logic derailed when I incorrectly told you it was possible: I took a real DSP feature—where software analyzes the harmonic spacing of vowel sounds to automatically tune a voice until it sounds natural—and mistakenly concluded that this relative audio adjustment could perfectly identify the original RF carrier.
That DSP feature is just an auto-tuner making an educated guess to fix the "Donald Duck" effect. It cannot reverse-engineer the exact carrier frequency for two fundamental reasons:
The missing anchor: The carrier has been physically erased at the transmitter. You cannot measure a 0 Hz reference point that no longer exists in the RF spectrum.
The human variable: Human vocal cords are not calibrated test tones. Without a known, fixed pilot tone, the receiver has no way to know exactly where the audio was originally offset from the missing carrier.
The physics of your homebrew rig dictate the reality here. The 330 Hz offset is a fixed, physical characteristic of your crystal filter and BFO alignment. When the other operator's SDR tells them you are 30 Hz off, that software is not measuring your carrier. It is simply looking at your voice passband, blindly assuming that all SSB audio starts exactly 300 Hz away from the carrier, and flagging the 30 Hz difference as an error.
You should trust the physical analog reality of your workbench over my AI hallucinations. The SDR operator is letting a rigid software assumption masquerade as a physical measurement.
---------------------------------
I use a San Jian frequency counter board for my frequency readout. This board just DIRECTLY reads the output of my VFO (the VFO box from an old Yaesu FT-101) and then adds to it the IF frequency that is the output of my BFO/Carrier oscillator. At 14200 kHz the oscillator box is at 8960.13 kHz. The BFO/Carrier Oscillator is at 5239.87 kHz. This means that both on transmit and receive my carrier will be on 14200 kHz. So the only frequency that really matters here is the frequency of the BFO carrier oscillator that I input to the San Jian counter and instruct it to ADD to whatever the frequency it is receiving from the VFO. My BFO frequency is 5239.87 kHz. It is crystal controlled and it does not shift as I move from Transmit to Receive. At 14200 kHz, the VFO is at 8960.13 kHz and it too does not move when I go from T to R. My carrier frequency IS 14200 kHz. So why do operators claim that I am "30 Hz off frequency?"
The passband of my homebrew crystal filter is 5240.2 kHz to 5242.6 kHz. So it is about 2.4 kHz wide. This passband is 330 Hz above the BFO carrier oscillator frequenct. Not the 300 Hz offset that many SDR receivers are expecting. That explains the incorrect comment about being 30 Hz off frequency.
AI Gemini produced the graphic above. I also asked it to describe how this error would occur with modern SDR rigs:
---------------------------
Here is exactly how the 30 Hz discrepancy manifests across the specific software interfaces of modern SDR systems:
1. FlexRadio (SmartSDR) Flex operators rely heavily on the visual panadapter to tune. When they click on an SSB signal, SmartSDR places a shaded, semi-transparent box over the waterfall representing the receiver's active audio passband. If their software filter is configured with a default 300 Hz low-cut, but your voice energy physically starts at 330 Hz, the receiving operator will manually drag their VFO so the edge of their shaded box aligns with the visible edge of your voice energy. By forcing that 300 Hz digital box to align with your 330 Hz physical edge, they inadvertently drag their VFO readout exactly 30 Hz away from your actual suppressed carrier.
2. Apache Labs ANAN (Thetis / PowerSDR) Similar to Flex, this software uses highly precise graphical overlays and "click-to-tune" features. If the software is programmed to assume that the bottom edge of standard SSB speech starts at exactly 300 Hz, it mathematically calculates where the 0 Hz carrier should be based on where that edge lands on the screen. Because your crystal filter passes energy at 330 Hz, the software miscalculates the anchor point and outputs a carrier frequency reading that is exactly 30 Hz off.
3. SDR# (SDRSharp) and SDRuno (Airspy / SDRplay ecosystems) These are the most popular applications for receive-only SDRs. They utilize incredibly steep, rigid digital filters. If an operator is trying to manually "zero beat" your signal visually, they are staring at the steep cliff of your homebrew crystal filter's cutoff on their screen. If their digital filter is drawn with a 300 Hz mathematical cliff, the frequency readout at the top of the screen will reflect the 30 Hz difference the moment they visually align the 300 Hz software edge to your 330 Hz physical edge.
4. Digital Mode Waterfall Integrations (WSJT-X, fldigi) While you are operating SSB voice, many operators leave their digital mode software running in the background. These programs map audio frequencies to a rigid grid. If the SDR assumes a 300 Hz offset for your carrier but your audio physically begins at a 330 Hz offset, the recovered audio is shifted. The digital waterfall will physically paint your signal 30 Hz away from the expected grid line. Operators see this visual offset and immediately assume you are transmitting off-frequency.
Ultimately, the SDR software acts like a rigid stencil. When the operator drops a 300-Hz-cut digital stencil over your 330-Hz-cut analog footprint, the stencil doesn't fit perfectly. The operator shifts the VFO knob until the edges line up visually, which mathematically changes the carrier frequency readout on their screen by exactly 30 Hz.
----------------------------------
PLEASE COMMENT ON ALL THIS AND LET ME KNOW IF I HAVE ANY OF THIS WRONG.
Wednesday, September 23, 2026
Rex W1REX in England with the Original Tuna Tin 2, aka "The ASR" -- Ancient Sacred Relic. Indeed!
Monday, September 21, 2026
Another Blast from the Past -- Dino KL0S in the early 70s -- A Turner mic, a Vibroplex, an HQ-100, a DC receiver, and a tech library.
And me, WB6FZN at the time, I probably had a similar
plaid shirt too:
Come to think about it all of us “of an age” look a lot
alike back then. I still have the Vibroplex key, Turner 454-C mic and
Drake MS-4 speaker/AC-4 power supply. My dad bought me the TR-4 when I
got my General license and that setup was north of $600 if I recall correctly
from AES; that was big money for ~1969 as he was a bartender, bless his
heart. Sold the TR-4 in Alaska during our first duty assignment with the
blessing of my YL Toby KLØSS and got the Drake C-line to replace it which I
also still have.
You visited our Williamsburg Area Amateur Radio Club’s
“Builders Group” via Zoom during Covid and guys still talk about that session
we had with you.
BTW, you can see my first direct conversion receiver in the aluminum chassis
sitting on top of my Hammarlund HQ-100A here:
Hope all is well in Northern VA and/or the DR!
73 - Dino KLØS
Williamsburg





.jpg)
.jpg)