One of the major complaints about LC VFOs is that they allegedly cause "non-linear tuning." Essentially, this complaint claims that you will inevitably end up with your frequencies all "bunched up" at one end of the tuning range, with frequencies greatly "spread out" at the other end. BUT WE HAVE FOUND THAT THIS IS NOT NECESARILY TRUE. With a bit of careful design work, you can avoid the dreaded "bunching up." I have used the calculator in Bob's Electron Bunker to DESIGN VFOs that do not "bunch up" the frequencies.
Recently, Mike WU2D built a version of the Simple X Super receiver. It has a VFO in the 5 - 6 MHz range. And guess what? There is NO bunching up of frequencies. As proof, I present the tuning dial that Mike made for his completed receiver. See above. Note the nice linear tuning.
So you see, success in this area is possible -- all it takes is some careful design work.
Similar results are possible with the other major allegation about LC VFOs: That they are inherently and irreparbly unstable. Proponents of this theory would have you believe that only by the use of an Si5351 (or something similarly digital) is stability possible. Again, NOT TRUE! It is possible to make LC oscillators that are stable. All it takes is careful design and good construction practices.
Posts
But of course you can get perfectly acceptable stability from the LC VFO's! Good design and choice of stable, Hi-Q components give excellent results. Sturdy construction is key. The type (who it's named after) matters little, if anything at all. And sure, the synthesizers work as well.
ReplyDeleteSet a stability criteria. Some publications have proffered 100 Hz/Hour after a 10 minute stabilzation. There are others. Then do a stability run. I automated mine, so I can run it and leave. See https://www.qsl.net/wn2a/MOUSEFET_11.pdf
pages 18-19. On 30M CW, I've been told "you must be running an XTAL rig". That was after a 1 hour QSO.
Just use what works for you and Get On The Air. 73!
Mike! Your dial is a thing of beauty!
ReplyDelete