I went into the rig and using my DDS sig generator and my RIGOL 'scope, measured actual performance. It looked worse than the prediction (part of the worsening is a difference in vertical scale):
LADBUILD lets you play around with the values of the components in the filters. I know that ripple is usually related to an impedance mismatch. So in LADBUILD I experimented (virtually) with different impedance values at the end. I noticed that at about 1000 ohms, the ripple and insertion loss got better:
So I went and built two broadband toroidal transformers. 4 turns primary with 12 turns secondary (1:9 Z). I'm assuming that the BITX has around 150 ohms at either end of the filter. That would put about 1350 ohms at the ends of the filter.
Here are the results:
Much better.
Our book: "SolderSmoke -- Global Adventures in Wireless Electronics" http://soldersmoke.com/book.htm Our coffee mugs, T-Shirts, bumper stickers: http://www.cafepress.com/SolderSmoke Our Book Store: http://astore.amazon.com/contracross-20
You should get really creative since you're playing with the software.
ReplyDeleteWhat about a crystal from one end of the filter to ground? Done right, that could put a notch at one side of the curve, making for getter sideband rejection on that side. At the very least, in the old days it wasn't uncommon to have a crystal to ground, notch out the carrier. One phasing rig did that, I can't remember which, a good trick in the days when balanced modulators sometimes had a tendency to unbalance.
Or some people play with crystals in parallel, certainly done in the days of crystal lattice filters, but I think I've seen some ladder filters done that way. I'm not sure anyone has given it thought, but charting it might say weather it has value or not.
Michael
Tweaking the filter response...
ReplyDeleteI'm impressed!
Bill N5AB