https://www.space.com/vernal-equinox-2020-earliest-spring-124-years.html
Posts
5 hours ago
Thursday, March 19, 2020
Wednesday, March 18, 2020
Double Trouble: Notes on TWO Hallicrafters S-38E Restorations and Alignments (with videos)
 |
| Winterfest S-38E on the left, junker on the right |
But as I've gotten to know the receiver better, I have come to like it. It is very simple. There is a certain minimalist thing that explains the attraction; it is a challenge to make the most of this very low-budget 1950's receiver. It uses tubes, but the voltage is not really in the very lethal range. It covers a wide range of frequencies. Its frequency stability is fairly good. And it sounds great on AM (scroll to the bottom to listen). It seems to be technologically related to the Echophone EC-1 -- we have been posting about the WWII advertisements featuring Hogarth and his (unbelievable) efforts to attract women with this receiver.
The S-38E has a big "picture window" frequency dial, marked with exotic foreign locations (Java!). I share with it a similar vintage with the S-38E: IGY. The S-38E was produced from 1957-1961. Duck and cover my friends; the CONELRAD frequencies are marked on the dial. Working on these two receivers has kept me busy during the first few days of the COVID-19 emergency.
The S-38E has a big "picture window" frequency dial, marked with exotic foreign locations (Java!). I share with it a similar vintage with the S-38E: IGY. The S-38E was produced from 1957-1961. Duck and cover my friends; the CONELRAD frequencies are marked on the dial. Working on these two receivers has kept me busy during the first few days of the COVID-19 emergency.
I now own two of these things. I might get a third. I thought it would be worthwhile to write up my experiences with the S-38E. I hope this information will be of use to others who might work on this piece of gear.
SHOCKINGLY BAD?
I had an S-38E as a kid. Around 1980, I gave it to my cousin Mary's husband Mike so he could listen to shortwave broadcasts. Recently I asked him about that S-38E -- he said it had given him a nasty shock. That was because of the "transformer-less" AC/DC power supply -- if you plugged the AC line cord in "the wrong way" you would be putting 115 V AC on the chassis. Ouch.
AC/DC DESTROYS AN ANTENNA COIL
I picked up an S-38E at a Vienna Wireless Winterfest a few years ago. I think I paid ten bucks. I didn't pay attention to the polarity of the AC plug and managed to plug it in the wrong way. Then I managed to short the antenna terminal to what turned out to be a very AC hot (115V) chassis. This destroyed a significant portion of the antenna coil. Smoke was released.
ISOLATION TRANSFORMER
Not wanting to repeat the hot chassis disaster, I installed an isolation transformer. On the junker, I used the Triad N-49X, available from Digikey. In retrospect I probably should have gone with the larger, 35 watt N-51X, but Fred KC5RT provided a great suggestion that would make the smaller N-49X adequate: Run the filaments in series DIRECTLY from the AC line, with neither side of the AC line to the chassis. Then run the rest of the circuitry through the isolation transformer. This would take a lot of current out of that little transformer and would likely make replacement with a larger unit unnecessary. I will try this later. Update: 2 April 2020: I tried to run the S-38E with the filaments in series fed with AC directly from the line cord and the rest of the circuit running through the isolation transformer. I got it working this way. Sort of. But AC hum was a lot louder and I found myself back in the AC/DC transformerless situation with the chassis going hot if the set is plugged in "the wrong way." So I retreated, going back to having the whole receiver running off the isolation transformer. The hum went back to the earlier (normal) level and the chassis would not go hot no matter how I plugged it in.
On the Winterfest S-38E it looks like I had used a larger isolation transformer.
I put a 500 ma fuse in the primary circuit. On the N-48X the black lines are primary, the red are secondary. One black line goes to the fuse, then on to the front panel on/off switch. The other side of the switch goes to the AC line. The other side of the AC line goes to the other black line. Neither of the AC lines goes to chassis. On the secondary side, one of the red lines goes to Pin 4 of V5 (rectifier); the other goes to the B- line which is Pin 3 of V3 the 12AV6 which is also connected to the volume control. I put the isolation transformer on the top side of the chassis. It ends up close to the speaker, and fairly close to the AF output transformer. This raises hum concerns.
HUM?
I did a test to see if my placement of the isolation transformer was adding to the hum. I simply took the S-38E back to its original transformer-less configuration and then listened to the hum. I noticed no difference and concluded that the isolation transformer is NOT adding to the hum. If there is a difference, I'd say that there is less hum with the isolation transformer. (And yes, I did make sure the AC line plug was in the correct way with the old power supply configuration.)
See what you think:
The hum is not really a problem. You can only hear it when the volume control is turned all the way down. As soon as you turn the volume control to the right, band noise overwhelms the hum and you can't hear it any more. I think this was the normal condition of this very economical receiver.
The two receivers have different speakers. The Winterfest speaker measures 7.6 ohms (DC) and the junker has a 3 ohm speaker (closer to that called for in the schematic). I think the 3 ohm speaker results in somewhat less hum.
REPAIRING/REPLACING THE ANTENNA COIL
After the smoke release, I tried to re-wind the burned out portions of the antenna coil on the Winterfest S-38E, but I got tired of the project, cursed all S-38s, and sent mine to the basement/crawl space. I would have given it away, but I was afraid that the recipient would electrocute himself. So it sat in the basement for a couple of years. Recently I got interested in shortwave listening again, so I pulled out the S-38E.
On e-bay, I found and bought an S-38 antenna coil. I put it in my S-38E, hoping that it would bring the receiver back to life. But I had a lot of trouble with the front end alignment. I theorized that the coil I had bought was from the original model of the S-38, and perhaps the S-38E coil had different inductances. So I went back to e-bay. There I found a junker S-38E being sold by Mark W1MEM. It had been owned by KA1WFY.
At the suggestion of Scott W1NB on the AntiqueRadio forum, before installing the coil from the junker, I measured the inductances of the S-38E coil and the previously obtained S38 coil. I was surprised to find that the values were almost identical. That meant that my theory about coil inductance differences was incorrect. But I took the S-38E coil from the junker and put it in my S-38E. I took note of the fact that the junker did not in fact look like junk, but there it was, sitting on the floor of the workshop, having had its antenna coil extracted. And I had in hand the old S-38 coil that I knew from testing was very close in value to the S-38E coil.
RF ALIGNMENT PROBLEMS
One of the problems I had was that the alignment instructions for the S-38E are very sparse. For the front end alignment, they just tell you to put signal generator signal into the antenna terminal, put a meter or scope on the audio output then tweak the antenna and oscillator coils for max output. I had no trouble getting the oscillator on the right frequency -- for bands 2 and 3 that would be the signal frequency PLUS .455 MHz. For Band 4 it would be signal frequency minus .455 MHz. But I could not get the LC circuit in the front end to peak on the input frequency. Now, if you have the peak for the input LC circuit in the wrong place, your receiver will still work (sort of) but image rejection will be even more horrible than it is designed to be.
For example, assume you want to tune a strong signal at 7.0 MHz. Your VFO is at 7.455 MHz. The difference frequency is .455 MHz. This signal goes through the IF transformers and you hear the signal.
But now tune down .910 MHz to 6.09 MHz. Your VFO will be at 6.545 MHz. 7.0 - 6.455 = .455 Unless the front end LC filter blocks the strong signal at 7.0 MHz, it will also show up at 6.09 MHz on your dial. If the S-38E is aligned properly, that front end LC circuit will track the tuned frequency. In this case it will be peaked at 6.09 MHz and the strong signal from 7.0 MHz will not get through. Oh happy day! That 7.0 MHz signal shows up only on one place on the dial. All is right with the universe.
Of course there is another image problem. If you are tuned to 3.9 MHz, your VFO is at 4.355 MHz. If a shortwave broadcaster fires up on 4.81 MHz, well 4.81 - 4.355 = .455 That is why I can hear "Brother Stair" raging away, seemingly at 3.9 MHz. Even if a simple receiver like this is properly aligned, a powerful shortwave broadcast signal will often get past the puny single LC circuit in the front end.
But what happens if the S-38E is misaligned? What happens if that LC circuit is peaking above the desired frequency?
Now when you tune to 6.09 MHz, the front end tuned circuit may be peaked at say 6.5 MHz. There is only one tuned circuit in this receiver front end, so the "skirts" are quite wide. Wide enough to let that 7.0 MHz signal through to the mixer where it mixes with the 6.545 MHz VFO output to produce a very audible output. This is what was happening when my S-38E was misaligned. The 40 meter ham band and the 75 meter hambands were both showing up at two places on the dial. After alignment, this problem disappeared.
I realized later what my problem was: I was putting far too much faith in the accuracy of the frequency readout needle on the front panel of the S-38E. Many of these receivers had had their dials restrung over the years, so in many cases the placement of the needle was significantly off.
MY RF ALIGNMENT METHOD
What you really need to do is this: At first, don't pay much attention to where the red or yellow frequency indicators are pointing. View them as rough measures. Put a signal generator across on the A1 antenna terminal, with ground from the sig gen going to both A2 and GND. Then put a scope probe across the same A1 -A2/GND terminals. On Band 2 set your sig generator to, say, 4.0 MHz. Tune the main tuning dial UNTIL YOU SEE A BIG DIP ON THE SCOPE. At that point your front end is tuned to 4.0 MHz. Now, you need to set the oscillator coil to 4.455 MHz. I used a separate general coverage receiver (Radio Shack DX-390) tuned to this frequency. I slowly tuned the trimmer on the oscillator coil until I could hear the oscillartor on 4.455 MHz on the DX-390. At this point the front end is in alignment.
It might not be that easy at first. You may need to use the LC trimmer and the oscillator trimmer to kind of "walk" the two desired frequencies close to each other. But by doing this, I was able to get the LC circuit to peak at the frequency at which the VFO was .455 MHz above the freq at which the LC signal peaked (the desired signal frequency). Now, you may notice that the red frequency indicator is not at 4.0 MHz exactly.
Later I decided to tackle this problem of front panel calibration. I decided to only worry about Band 2 (1.6 -5.0 MHz) and Band 3 (4.8-14.5 MHz).
I picked two frequencies on these two bands that would use the same position of the red tuning pointer. (I put they yellow bandspread pointer at 0. ) I chose 9 MHz and 3.1 MHz.
For Band 3, at 9 MHz I set up my sig gen and scope as described above. With the sig gen on 9 MHz, I tuned the main tuning dial for a dip at 9 MHz. Then, keeping the tuning cap at the same spot, I moved the red pointer to exactly 9 MHz. (I just pinched the cord to the front panel with my finger and slid the red pointer down along the cord a bit. I then turned on my general coverage receiver, set it to 9.455 MHz and turned oscillator trimmer H (see above) until I heard the VFO at that frequency.
I then moved the S-38E to Band 2. I set the sig gen to 3.1 MHz. Leaving the main tuning cap and the red pointer exactly where they were, I tuned the antenna coil trimmer L until I saw the dip on my scope. I then turned the general coverage receiver on to 3.555 MHz and tuned oscillator trimmer K until I heard the oscillator signal at that frequency.
The S-38E was then aligned for RF on Bands 2 and 3 with fairly good front dial calibration.
Here is how to tell if you've got it lined up right. Tune to the 75 meter band on Band 2 or to the 40 meter band on band 3. Then tune 910 kHz BELOW where you found the ham band. Do you hear the ham chatter in that second location on the dial? If you do, the signal strength should be significantly lower than the signal strength 910 KHz up. If you don't hear it at all, great. If you hear it at significantly reduced strength, that's OK too. the S-38E has only ONE tuned circuit between the mixer and the antenna, so you can't expect really great image attenuation. But if you hear the image at the same strength (or stronger!) than the desired signal, you have placed the peak of the antenna input tuned circuit in the wrong place. See above. Try it again.
IF ALIGNMENT
IF alignment was relatively easy: I put a 455 kHz signal onto the grid of V1 and my scope on pins 5 & 6 of V3. I then peaked the four IF transformer coils. The IF cans in he Winterfest receiver were close to .455 kHz. The coils in the junker were quite a bit out of tune.
RECAP
On the first S-38E I assumed that I would have to change out all the electolytics and the older tubular capacitors. So I did. But with the second ("junker") S-38E my replacement capacitors from Hayseed Hamfest had not yet arrived. So I pulled out my Variac and made a somewhat hasty effort to re-form the original caps. It seemed to work. No smoke was released. Nothing exploded. There is no horrible hum. But I could tell that all was not quite right. The BFO really wasn't oscillating properly. When the capacitor kit from Hayseed Hamfest arrived, I replaced all the caps. The receiver works great -- including the BFO.
ALIGNMENT OF THE JUNKER
Armed with my newfound knowledge of how to align an S-38E, I applied this skill to the junker and was able to get it aligned without difficulty.
RE-STRINGING OF DIAL CORDS
On both of these S-38-Es there were dial string problems. Interestingly, both problems were with the BANDSPREAD dial cord, NOT with the MAIN TUNING dial strings. I see this as evidence that these receivers were used by ham radio operators. You don't really need the bandspread to tune AM shortwave station, or AM broadcast band stations. But novice ham radio ops would be frantically tuning that bandspread control up and down, wearing those dial springs out. The Bandspread dial string on my Winterfest S-38E broke while I was turning it -- I replaced it but it is not really smooth, so I may try again. The Bandspread dial on the junker broke also.
My re-stringing skills were better the second time around. Tips: use a small file to "roughen up" the spindle on the tuning knob (just the center of the spindle, so it will grab the cord better). Before installing, rub the new dial cord with an isopropyl alcohol pad, then run the string (still a a bit wet) several times over a piece of violin rosin. This seemed to prep the dial cord well.
Sometimes you need a bit more tension on the string to get the tuning spindle to grip properly. Unlike the Drake 2-B, the S-38E does not have several hooks on which to attach the spring. Not wanting to have to start all over just to add a bit more tension on the string, I came up with an easier solution: Just put a few twists in the string near the spring by twisting the spring (with strings attached) around a few times. Like this:
The junker had original Hallicrafters tubes.
LISTEN!
Here are some YouTube videos of the S-38Es in action:
 |
| Winterfest RX on the left, junker on the right |
SHOCKINGLY BAD?
I had an S-38E as a kid. Around 1980, I gave it to my cousin Mary's husband Mike so he could listen to shortwave broadcasts. Recently I asked him about that S-38E -- he said it had given him a nasty shock. That was because of the "transformer-less" AC/DC power supply -- if you plugged the AC line cord in "the wrong way" you would be putting 115 V AC on the chassis. Ouch.
AC/DC DESTROYS AN ANTENNA COIL
I picked up an S-38E at a Vienna Wireless Winterfest a few years ago. I think I paid ten bucks. I didn't pay attention to the polarity of the AC plug and managed to plug it in the wrong way. Then I managed to short the antenna terminal to what turned out to be a very AC hot (115V) chassis. This destroyed a significant portion of the antenna coil. Smoke was released.
ISOLATION TRANSFORMER
Not wanting to repeat the hot chassis disaster, I installed an isolation transformer. On the junker, I used the Triad N-49X, available from Digikey. In retrospect I probably should have gone with the larger, 35 watt N-51X, but Fred KC5RT provided a great suggestion that would make the smaller N-49X adequate: Run the filaments in series DIRECTLY from the AC line, with neither side of the AC line to the chassis. Then run the rest of the circuitry through the isolation transformer. This would take a lot of current out of that little transformer and would likely make replacement with a larger unit unnecessary. I will try this later. Update: 2 April 2020: I tried to run the S-38E with the filaments in series fed with AC directly from the line cord and the rest of the circuit running through the isolation transformer. I got it working this way. Sort of. But AC hum was a lot louder and I found myself back in the AC/DC transformerless situation with the chassis going hot if the set is plugged in "the wrong way." So I retreated, going back to having the whole receiver running off the isolation transformer. The hum went back to the earlier (normal) level and the chassis would not go hot no matter how I plugged it in.
On the Winterfest S-38E it looks like I had used a larger isolation transformer.
I put a 500 ma fuse in the primary circuit. On the N-48X the black lines are primary, the red are secondary. One black line goes to the fuse, then on to the front panel on/off switch. The other side of the switch goes to the AC line. The other side of the AC line goes to the other black line. Neither of the AC lines goes to chassis. On the secondary side, one of the red lines goes to Pin 4 of V5 (rectifier); the other goes to the B- line which is Pin 3 of V3 the 12AV6 which is also connected to the volume control. I put the isolation transformer on the top side of the chassis. It ends up close to the speaker, and fairly close to the AF output transformer. This raises hum concerns.
 |
| Where I placed the isolation transformer on both my S-38Es |
I did a test to see if my placement of the isolation transformer was adding to the hum. I simply took the S-38E back to its original transformer-less configuration and then listened to the hum. I noticed no difference and concluded that the isolation transformer is NOT adding to the hum. If there is a difference, I'd say that there is less hum with the isolation transformer. (And yes, I did make sure the AC line plug was in the correct way with the old power supply configuration.)
See what you think:
The hum is not really a problem. You can only hear it when the volume control is turned all the way down. As soon as you turn the volume control to the right, band noise overwhelms the hum and you can't hear it any more. I think this was the normal condition of this very economical receiver.
The two receivers have different speakers. The Winterfest speaker measures 7.6 ohms (DC) and the junker has a 3 ohm speaker (closer to that called for in the schematic). I think the 3 ohm speaker results in somewhat less hum.
REPAIRING/REPLACING THE ANTENNA COIL
After the smoke release, I tried to re-wind the burned out portions of the antenna coil on the Winterfest S-38E, but I got tired of the project, cursed all S-38s, and sent mine to the basement/crawl space. I would have given it away, but I was afraid that the recipient would electrocute himself. So it sat in the basement for a couple of years. Recently I got interested in shortwave listening again, so I pulled out the S-38E.
On e-bay, I found and bought an S-38 antenna coil. I put it in my S-38E, hoping that it would bring the receiver back to life. But I had a lot of trouble with the front end alignment. I theorized that the coil I had bought was from the original model of the S-38, and perhaps the S-38E coil had different inductances. So I went back to e-bay. There I found a junker S-38E being sold by Mark W1MEM. It had been owned by KA1WFY.
At the suggestion of Scott W1NB on the AntiqueRadio forum, before installing the coil from the junker, I measured the inductances of the S-38E coil and the previously obtained S38 coil. I was surprised to find that the values were almost identical. That meant that my theory about coil inductance differences was incorrect. But I took the S-38E coil from the junker and put it in my S-38E. I took note of the fact that the junker did not in fact look like junk, but there it was, sitting on the floor of the workshop, having had its antenna coil extracted. And I had in hand the old S-38 coil that I knew from testing was very close in value to the S-38E coil.
I was kind of getting tired of S-38s at this point, and I thought about leaving work on the junker S-38 for another day (or another year, or decade), but familiarity with the innards of the rig and alignment procedures is perishable, so I decided to try to get the junker going while it as all still fresh in my mind. I installed the isolation transformer mod on the junker and put the S-38 antenna coil in. That is how I came to own a second S-38E.
RF ALIGNMENT PROBLEMS
One of the problems I had was that the alignment instructions for the S-38E are very sparse. For the front end alignment, they just tell you to put signal generator signal into the antenna terminal, put a meter or scope on the audio output then tweak the antenna and oscillator coils for max output. I had no trouble getting the oscillator on the right frequency -- for bands 2 and 3 that would be the signal frequency PLUS .455 MHz. For Band 4 it would be signal frequency minus .455 MHz. But I could not get the LC circuit in the front end to peak on the input frequency. Now, if you have the peak for the input LC circuit in the wrong place, your receiver will still work (sort of) but image rejection will be even more horrible than it is designed to be.
For example, assume you want to tune a strong signal at 7.0 MHz. Your VFO is at 7.455 MHz. The difference frequency is .455 MHz. This signal goes through the IF transformers and you hear the signal.
But now tune down .910 MHz to 6.09 MHz. Your VFO will be at 6.545 MHz. 7.0 - 6.455 = .455 Unless the front end LC filter blocks the strong signal at 7.0 MHz, it will also show up at 6.09 MHz on your dial. If the S-38E is aligned properly, that front end LC circuit will track the tuned frequency. In this case it will be peaked at 6.09 MHz and the strong signal from 7.0 MHz will not get through. Oh happy day! That 7.0 MHz signal shows up only on one place on the dial. All is right with the universe.
Of course there is another image problem. If you are tuned to 3.9 MHz, your VFO is at 4.355 MHz. If a shortwave broadcaster fires up on 4.81 MHz, well 4.81 - 4.355 = .455 That is why I can hear "Brother Stair" raging away, seemingly at 3.9 MHz. Even if a simple receiver like this is properly aligned, a powerful shortwave broadcast signal will often get past the puny single LC circuit in the front end.
Now when you tune to 6.09 MHz, the front end tuned circuit may be peaked at say 6.5 MHz. There is only one tuned circuit in this receiver front end, so the "skirts" are quite wide. Wide enough to let that 7.0 MHz signal through to the mixer where it mixes with the 6.545 MHz VFO output to produce a very audible output. This is what was happening when my S-38E was misaligned. The 40 meter ham band and the 75 meter hambands were both showing up at two places on the dial. After alignment, this problem disappeared.
I realized later what my problem was: I was putting far too much faith in the accuracy of the frequency readout needle on the front panel of the S-38E. Many of these receivers had had their dials restrung over the years, so in many cases the placement of the needle was significantly off.
MY RF ALIGNMENT METHOD
What you really need to do is this: At first, don't pay much attention to where the red or yellow frequency indicators are pointing. View them as rough measures. Put a signal generator across on the A1 antenna terminal, with ground from the sig gen going to both A2 and GND. Then put a scope probe across the same A1 -A2/GND terminals. On Band 2 set your sig generator to, say, 4.0 MHz. Tune the main tuning dial UNTIL YOU SEE A BIG DIP ON THE SCOPE. At that point your front end is tuned to 4.0 MHz. Now, you need to set the oscillator coil to 4.455 MHz. I used a separate general coverage receiver (Radio Shack DX-390) tuned to this frequency. I slowly tuned the trimmer on the oscillator coil until I could hear the oscillartor on 4.455 MHz on the DX-390. At this point the front end is in alignment.
It might not be that easy at first. You may need to use the LC trimmer and the oscillator trimmer to kind of "walk" the two desired frequencies close to each other. But by doing this, I was able to get the LC circuit to peak at the frequency at which the VFO was .455 MHz above the freq at which the LC signal peaked (the desired signal frequency). Now, you may notice that the red frequency indicator is not at 4.0 MHz exactly.
Later I decided to tackle this problem of front panel calibration. I decided to only worry about Band 2 (1.6 -5.0 MHz) and Band 3 (4.8-14.5 MHz).
I picked two frequencies on these two bands that would use the same position of the red tuning pointer. (I put they yellow bandspread pointer at 0. ) I chose 9 MHz and 3.1 MHz.
For Band 3, at 9 MHz I set up my sig gen and scope as described above. With the sig gen on 9 MHz, I tuned the main tuning dial for a dip at 9 MHz. Then, keeping the tuning cap at the same spot, I moved the red pointer to exactly 9 MHz. (I just pinched the cord to the front panel with my finger and slid the red pointer down along the cord a bit. I then turned on my general coverage receiver, set it to 9.455 MHz and turned oscillator trimmer H (see above) until I heard the VFO at that frequency.
I then moved the S-38E to Band 2. I set the sig gen to 3.1 MHz. Leaving the main tuning cap and the red pointer exactly where they were, I tuned the antenna coil trimmer L until I saw the dip on my scope. I then turned the general coverage receiver on to 3.555 MHz and tuned oscillator trimmer K until I heard the oscillator signal at that frequency.
The S-38E was then aligned for RF on Bands 2 and 3 with fairly good front dial calibration.
Here is how to tell if you've got it lined up right. Tune to the 75 meter band on Band 2 or to the 40 meter band on band 3. Then tune 910 kHz BELOW where you found the ham band. Do you hear the ham chatter in that second location on the dial? If you do, the signal strength should be significantly lower than the signal strength 910 KHz up. If you don't hear it at all, great. If you hear it at significantly reduced strength, that's OK too. the S-38E has only ONE tuned circuit between the mixer and the antenna, so you can't expect really great image attenuation. But if you hear the image at the same strength (or stronger!) than the desired signal, you have placed the peak of the antenna input tuned circuit in the wrong place. See above. Try it again.
IF ALIGNMENT
IF alignment was relatively easy: I put a 455 kHz signal onto the grid of V1 and my scope on pins 5 & 6 of V3. I then peaked the four IF transformer coils. The IF cans in he Winterfest receiver were close to .455 kHz. The coils in the junker were quite a bit out of tune.
RECAP
On the first S-38E I assumed that I would have to change out all the electolytics and the older tubular capacitors. So I did. But with the second ("junker") S-38E my replacement capacitors from Hayseed Hamfest had not yet arrived. So I pulled out my Variac and made a somewhat hasty effort to re-form the original caps. It seemed to work. No smoke was released. Nothing exploded. There is no horrible hum. But I could tell that all was not quite right. The BFO really wasn't oscillating properly. When the capacitor kit from Hayseed Hamfest arrived, I replaced all the caps. The receiver works great -- including the BFO.
 |
| Recapping in process. Hayseed electrolytic in green can.. Old tubular caps being replaced by new yellow caps. |
 |
| Recapping completed |
ALIGNMENT OF THE JUNKER
Armed with my newfound knowledge of how to align an S-38E, I applied this skill to the junker and was able to get it aligned without difficulty.
RE-STRINGING OF DIAL CORDS
On both of these S-38-Es there were dial string problems. Interestingly, both problems were with the BANDSPREAD dial cord, NOT with the MAIN TUNING dial strings. I see this as evidence that these receivers were used by ham radio operators. You don't really need the bandspread to tune AM shortwave station, or AM broadcast band stations. But novice ham radio ops would be frantically tuning that bandspread control up and down, wearing those dial springs out. The Bandspread dial string on my Winterfest S-38E broke while I was turning it -- I replaced it but it is not really smooth, so I may try again. The Bandspread dial on the junker broke also.
 |
| Broken Bandspread string from Winterfest S-38E |
 |
| Approximating the size for the replacement string |
Sometimes you need a bit more tension on the string to get the tuning spindle to grip properly. Unlike the Drake 2-B, the S-38E does not have several hooks on which to attach the spring. Not wanting to have to start all over just to add a bit more tension on the string, I came up with an easier solution: Just put a few twists in the string near the spring by twisting the spring (with strings attached) around a few times. Like this:
You also need something that allows the indicator needle to grip the dial cord. I cut open a short piec of heat-shrink tubing, put it over the cord at the desired spot, hit it with hot air, then put a small dab of super glue at each end of the tubing. ( See above.) This allowed the dial pointed to grip the cord very firmly. Because you may need to move the red pointer during dial calibration (see above) I'd recommend NOT putting the drops of glue on the cord for the red pointer -- you may need to slide the red one up or down a bit.
TUBES
On the Winterfest S-38E, the BFO had a very rough tone, making it impossible to copy SSB or even CW. I thought it might be a bad set of filter caps, but after I replaced them, the problem was still there. So I then replaced the tubes (warning -- that 50CS audio amplifier is expensive). This fixed the problem
LISTEN!
Here are some YouTube videos of the S-38Es in action:
Tuesday, March 17, 2020
Saturday, March 14, 2020
SolderSmoke Podcast #219 SPECIAL CORONA VIRUS CRISIS PODCAST
SolderSmoke Podcast #219 is available for download:
14 March 2020
SPECIAL CORONA VIRUS EMERGENCY EDITION
We thought it would be nice to put out a special edition of
the podcast to help listeners keep up their morale during this difficult
time. So we’ll do our regular kind of
show, but we’ll try to emphasize things you can do to stay busy and keep up
morale while stuck at home.
BILL’S BENCH (and
operating position)
--NOVICE RIG ROUNDUP.
NRR. Continues through this
weekend. Lots of fun. Cool rigs worked:
Jon WS1K’s "Scrounger." Greg
AA8V’s 6X2 superhet. And WN4NRR.
-- S-38 MANIA. My
S-38E story. Bought parts. Bought a junker. Fixed the first one then used the parts to
fix the junker. Now I have 2 S-38Es.
-- Got capacitor kit from Hayseed Hamfest. FB.
PETE’S BENCH
Hilbert Transforms
AD9833 glued onto a Nano
Teesny and Radig and ZL2CTM
PWKSCDS
More Mint
SOME THINGS TO DO DURING COVID 19 CRISIS
WebSDR NA5B
Revive an old boatanchor
Get back into shortwave listening.
Get on the air—make some contacts!
Take a walk. Get some
exercise. Listen to SolderSmoke and
other podcasts when you walk.
Cook something from the famous Pasta Pete web site.
Help someone who needs help.
MAILBAG
QSP – What a cool magazine! Pete and I both have articles in there.
Hot Iron – great new issue also. Lots in there.
Tony Fishpool G4WIF
Words of Wisdom on the NanoVNA.
Thursday, March 12, 2020
Thoughts on How Hams Can Use the Shortwave Broadcast Frequencies
Ed DD5LP sent us some very interesting information about a resurgence of shortwave broadcast activity in Europe. Thanks Ed.
Here is a collection of QSL cards sent out last year by some of these new stations.
Hi
Bill,
I'm
just listening to the latest podcast and note your returning lovefor AM
Broadcast stations and wondered if you also see the trend in the US that we are
seeing in Germany?
I
know you have WTWW but that's a commercial SW AM Broadcast radio station, that
has always been owned and run by a family of Hams. What we are seeing Germany
is that when a commercial broadcaster such as Deutsche Welle closes down their
Shortwave Broadcast stations, Amateurs are applying for and getting licences to
the freed up frequencies. This started about 5 years ago with channel292
(Channel292.de) on initially 6070 kHz and then later also on 7440 kHz.
This amateur is located near Ingolstadt in Bavaria and runs 10 kW using the
driver stage from the old DeutscheWelle 100 kW transmitter on the same
frequency. He is partnered with a group in Austria who run a major AM station
near Vienna that has two 500 kW transmitters and some fantastic massive antenna
systems with 20dB gain across the whole of the HF spectrum. That Austrian
station is still owned by the Austrian government in case they need a broadcast
station to transmit around the world at any time. It's kept "idling"
at 100 kW in the meantime and like Channel 292 includes the German language "DARC
Radio" amateur radio program in what it transmits.
New
on the scene is "shortwaveradio.de" - Yes the station name is the same
as their web address. They currently run just 1 kW into an Inverted-V wire
antenna on 3975 kHz (in the 75m BROADCAST band over here) and 6160 kHz in the
49m broadcast band. As they are located
in North Germany, I don't get much of a signal from them down here in the south
and the recording is using a WebSDR receiver. Their dipole is orientated to
cover the Benelux countries and the UK. The lads at this station are always
looking for English content, so if you want part of Soldersmoke to be
transmitted on a shortwave AM broadcast station, (as you mentioned in the
latest podcast) I can easily put you in touch with them.
One
more for the list could be Radio Caroline in the UK. The station, which once
was the main pirate radio station off the coast of the UK is now a volunteer
historic preservation society (with some radio Hams involved) who have been
granted a local radio service licence using a frequency (648 kHz) and
transmitter site previously used by the BBC world service! Their old nemesis ! (http://www.radiocaroline.co.uk/#home.html )
73
Ed DD5LP / G8GLM / VK2JI.
Wednesday, March 11, 2020
QSO Today Interview with Dale Parfitt W4OP
Eric Guth 4Z1UG interviewed Homebrew Hero Dale Parfitt W4OP on the QSO Today podcast. The interview is really great. Listen here:
https://www.qsotoday.com/podcasts/W4OP
Wow, libration fading. Who knew?
Dale has appeared in many SolderSmoke bolg posts and podcasts. He is definitely in the Homebrew Hero category.
Check out some of those blog posts here:
https://soldersmoke.blogspot.com/search?q=Parfitt
and here:
https://soldersmoke.blogspot.com/search/label/Parfitt--%20Dale
Thanks to Eric and Dale.
Tuesday, March 10, 2020
The Woz on Technology, Surplus Parts, Intercoms, and Ham Radio
Thanks to Dan Random for alerting us to this. During the first five minutes Woz talks about being an "electronics kid" and becoming a ham radio operator. For me also, wired intercoms were a precursor to ham radio.
More SolderSmoke blog posts on Steve Wozniak here:
https://soldersmoke.blogspot.com/search/label/Wozniak%20--%20Steve
Monday, March 9, 2020
The Homebrew Rigs I Worked During the First Day of Novice Rig Roundup (NRR)
The Thing-of-Beauty above is "The Scrounger" homebrew transmitter of Jon WS1K. Jon writes:
The rig I used this morning was the Scrounger. I built it a couple of weeks ago. It took me about 2 months of trolling a local thrift store for the right pan. I wanted a pan that captured the spirit of a true Novice built rig.
As a side note, the key that I'm using is a JH Bunnell that I bought at one of the MIT flea markets last summer in Cambridge. It's mounted on a piece of plywood and written on the plywood is the Novice callsign WN1UMD. Cool or what?
More of Jon's rigs here: https://www.qrz.com/db/WS1K
Above is Greg Latta AA8V's amazing 6X2 superhet receiver:
More details here:
Saturday, March 7, 2020
N2CQR Novice Rig Roundup Station
I actually used that Drake 2-B as a novice back in 1973-1974. The HT-37 came a bit later.
For the Novice Rig Roundup I used the beautiful key that Peter VK2EMU sent me. Thanks again Peter.
Novice Rig Roundup is a lot of fun. I was on 40 CW in the old Novice band today. Worked Greg AA8V who was using a homebrew superhet receiver -- that doesn't happen every day. Another station asked a question that we don't hear much these days: "What are you running?"
I will make some more contacts during the rest of the NRR period (scroll down to a recent blog post for more details). I have my NRR serial number. Thanks to the organizers for putting together this fun event.
Thursday, March 5, 2020
Boat Knack -- Rebuilding a 1910 yacht "Tally Ho"
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCg-_lYeV8hBnDSay7nmphUA
I present this as part of our occasional series on people with other kinds of Knack. The young Englishman in this series of videos is definitely in this category. Watch him acquire the 1910 yacht "Tally Ho" for 1 pound sterling, transport it to Washington state, SINGLE HANDEDLY build a boat shed around the huge vessel, and carry out the restoration. Oh yea, all the while shooting videos of his work. Great stuff.
I advise you to watch the series from the beginning. The next video in the series will load automatically.
Be sure to subscribe the channel.
Thanks to Ryan Flowers of https://miscdotgeek.com/ for alerting us to this.
I present this as part of our occasional series on people with other kinds of Knack. The young Englishman in this series of videos is definitely in this category. Watch him acquire the 1910 yacht "Tally Ho" for 1 pound sterling, transport it to Washington state, SINGLE HANDEDLY build a boat shed around the huge vessel, and carry out the restoration. Oh yea, all the while shooting videos of his work. Great stuff.
I advise you to watch the series from the beginning. The next video in the series will load automatically.
Be sure to subscribe the channel.
Thanks to Ryan Flowers of https://miscdotgeek.com/ for alerting us to this.
Wednesday, March 4, 2020
N3FJZ's Al Fresco. BITX-inspired, TIA. 50 Watt, SSB Rig (Video)
The last blog postings on Rick N3FJZ were in 2015. Rick sent me a very uplifting reception report, then we had a pretty amazing Homebrew-to-Homebrew contact.
Paul Taylor VK3HN yesterday alerted me to a new YouTube video that shows the progress Rick has made with his homebrew SSB rig.
This is a great example of true amateur SSB construction. Rick is making use of a combination of digital and analog technology. He is adapting circuitry developed by others and using it to meet his needs. During the development stage he is keeping the circuit open (Al Fresco) so that he can easily work on it.
FB Rick.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
