Just go to http://soldersmoke.com. On that archive page, just click on the blue hyperlinks and your audio player should play that episode.
http://soldersmoke.com
Coming home from the Dominican Republic, this was a major item on my list of desired mods for the uBITX: a narrower passband for CW. Using the 2.3 kHz SSB passband, you could have many CW QSOs audible in your headphones. Narrow that passband to 200-300 Hz and life gets a lot easier. Farhan had discussed adding a 12 Mhz IF filter of suitable CW bandwidth, but this seemed difficult to me. Besides, I have long wanted to use an active audio filter for this purpose. The Hi-Per-Mite filter from 4 State QRP Group is just what I needed. I built the kit without problems in about an hour, then I put it in the uBITX box, with switch on the front panel that lets me put it in the circuit or take it out -- this is very satisfying and a lot of fun. The Hi-Per-Mite just goes between the uBITX audio out and the speaker/headphone connection. I built mine for "no gain" -- the uBITX provides plenty of audio. The selectivity with the Hi-Per-Mite compares favorably to that of my Drake 2-B with the 500 Hz LC filter. You can get an idea of the performance in the video. Three cheers for the 4 State QRP Group and their Hi-Per-Mite! Here is the page with all the info: http://www.4sqrp.com/hipermite.php
They say it's easier to make a narrow ladder filter than a wide one. Many a receiver in the old days got by with a single crystal filter, which then got loaded down with resistance to broaden for voice. Of course at 455KHz the IF transformers would help more with skirt selectivity than at 12MHz.
But then you have the SSB filter to provide skirt selectivity, so maybe a simple single crystal filter in series would be fine for CW.
The hardest part might be adding switching of some sort to remove the CW filter when doing ssb.
The neat thing about using a synthesizer controlled by a computer is that you can shift the frequencies as needed just by changing software. So if the filter isn't on the same frequency, just shift the local oscillator, and the BFO. So much easier than in analog days. If the IF strip is otherwise broadband, you can use that commercial crystal filter on 9MHz for SSB, and that 2MHz wider filter for AM, and some third frequency for a CW filter. No need to add mixers to make an odd filter compatible with an existing IF frequency. Of course, this may affect other things, like image rejection or where the spurs land.
Digging into the material for this audio filter, it derives from an article in "73" for May 1994. I have no idea how much was changed, but someone could just go back a quarter century and build from scratch.
I forgot, whatever happened to commutating filters?
The first issue if QST I ever saw, April 1971, had an article about tgem, though called a "digital filter".
Some capacitors of the same value, and something to switch them sequentially, and a divider to drive them. The center frequency set by the frequency of the oscillator, so easy to change.
The Tayloe mixer derives from the concept.
There were articoes decades ago, including one in Ham Radio that was well detailed, but not much in recent times. There are limitations, but you can't get much simpler. I've onky seen them used for audio, I don't know if they can translate up to low IF frequencies
"SolderSmoke -- Global Adventures in Wireless Electronics" is now available as an e-book for Amazon's Kindle.
Here's the site:
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B004V9FIVW
Bill's OTHER Book (Warning: Not About Radio)
Click on the image to learn more
Where are the readers of SolderSmoke Daily News?
Pete Juliano N6QW
Master Homebrewer
Dean Souleles KK4DAS
With beret and with a Michigan Mighty Mite in hand
Contests and Operating.
-
This is the focus of a majority of US Hams so now you have the info on one
page. This of course means you will need to spend $10K with new gear
enhanceme...
Elecraft KX2 + AX1: Grab-and-Go POTA Radio Therapy
-
by Thomas (K4SWL) Sometimes we pack our bags and set out on a voyage to an
undiscovered POTA site—trying to keep anticipation and excitement at
bay—and som...
BARA Hamfest - Bergen County, NJ
-
The semi-annual Fall BARA Hamfest is Saturday, October 11, 2025.
Always lots of fun, lots of vendors, lots of stuff, food, etc.
Go here for the details:
h...
“The Jingy 40” – A Two-Transistor Regen
-
Or “The One-Transistor Regen That Turned Into A Two-Transistor Regen” with
thanks to G3XBM and N0WVA. About 10 years ago, Doug N0WVA told me about an
impre...
The Communicator September - October 2025
-
*Back With a Fall Issue*
This publication, "The Communicator" from Surrey Amateur Radio
Communications (SARC), serves as a bi-monthly electronic periodical...
W1WEF
-
Episode 530 - Jack Schuster - W1WEF In this episode of QSO Today, we sit
down with Jack Schuster, W1WEF, whose amateur radio journey spans more than
73 yea...
The "George Batterson 1935 CW QSO Party" - Summary
-
The first *George Batterson CW QSO Party* has concluded and the results are
in! The "*GB*" was introduced to honor George Batterson (W2GB), who along
wi...
KK4DAS MB 20 Transceiver Complete
-
The MB 20 transceiver is now complete. The rig is a homebrew 10-watt
20-meter SSB transceiver. The VFO module was an ebay purchase of a
salvaged Yeasu...
A Curious 9 MHz Crystal from Mouser Electronics
-
Just a quick post to share info about a good 9 MHz crystal sold by Mouser
Electronics.
I last purchased batches of crystals for xtal IF filters back in 2...
40m Pelican Case SSB Transceiver
-
See YouTube channels for details:
http://www.youtube.com/c/CharlieMorrisZL2CTM
*Test code for the LCD and Si5351*
#include
...
Hollow-State Design, 3rd Edition
-
Hollow-State Design, 3rd Edition is available from: Lulu Press:
tinyurl.com/hollowstatedesign3 eBay: search for “hollow-state design”
Electric Radio bookst...
I Finally Bought My Dream Airplane
-
Aviation has been a love of mine since I was a very little person. Living
in Nevada, seeing posters and ads for the Reno Air Races, specifically the
Texa...
Daylight Again – An all Analog Radio
-
What’s all this? In 10 seconds, A high performance, 7MHz, 5 watt SSB rig
Draws just 24 mA of current 90 dB dynamic range, 80 dB close-in dynamic
range 3D ...
Modifications to the Dayton/FDIM-2019 Antuino
-
The Dayton Antuino has sub-optimal performance. This is a short note on
improving it to an 80 db range of measurements. The trouble with Antuino
2.0 (the o...
Raduino as NBFM TX
-
Here is a neat, 30 minute hack for your Raduino to turn the Si5351 into a
pretty stable, solid NBFM transmitter. The hack is to add a varactor diode
in ...
QRP Labs shop!
-
[image: Shop]
All QRP Labs kits may be ordered online securely at the shop, with PayPal
payment.
*Click here to visit the shop!*
*Click!*
*Shop! Order...
Posts
.jpg)
It is indeed a very good addition for the uBitx.
ReplyDeleteI have also implemented it in my uBitx.
https://www.ph2lb.nl/blog/index.php?page=ubitx-mods3#ubitx-mod14
IMHO a must have.
They say it's easier to make a narrow ladder filter than a wide one. Many a receiver in the old days got by with a single crystal filter, which then got loaded down with resistance to broaden for voice. Of course at 455KHz the IF transformers would help more with skirt selectivity than at 12MHz.
ReplyDeleteBut then you have the SSB filter to provide skirt selectivity, so maybe a simple single crystal filter in series would be fine for CW.
The hardest part might be adding switching of some sort to remove the CW filter when doing ssb.
The neat thing about using a synthesizer controlled by a computer is that you can shift the frequencies as needed just by changing software. So if the filter isn't on the same frequency, just shift the local oscillator, and the BFO. So much easier than in analog days. If the IF strip is otherwise broadband, you can use that commercial crystal filter on 9MHz for SSB, and that 2MHz wider filter for AM, and some third frequency for a CW filter. No need to add mixers to make an odd filter compatible with an existing IF frequency. Of course, this may affect other things, like image rejection or where the spurs land.
Digging into the material for this audio filter, it derives from an article in "73" for May 1994. I have no idea how much was changed, but someone could just go back a quarter century and build from scratch.
I forgot, whatever happened to commutating filters?
ReplyDeleteThe first issue if QST I ever saw, April 1971, had an article about tgem, though called a "digital filter".
Some capacitors of the same value, and something to switch them sequentially, and a divider to drive them. The center frequency set by the frequency of the oscillator, so easy to change.
The Tayloe mixer derives from the concept.
There were articoes decades ago, including one in Ham Radio that was well detailed, but not much in recent times. There are limitations, but you can't get much simpler. I've onky seen them used for audio, I don't know if they can translate up to low IF frequencies