Just go to http://soldersmoke.com. On that archive page, just click on the blue hyperlinks and your audio player should play that episode.
http://soldersmoke.com
I have misgivings about this. Hack-A-Day presents it as a DIY radio project and wonders if this might be the modern equivalent of the crystal radio projects of days-gone-by. But notice that the "build" video focuses mostly on building the box. The electronic "building" of this radio mostly involves plugging in two chips, or two boards with chips. My questions are: 1) When this project is finished, who REALLY built it? You, or the Si4730 manufacturer? 2) After you've "built" this thing, would you have the same sense of accomplishment that you get from an analog, discrete component project? Or even from that crystal radio? Of course, to each his own. This is all for fun. Have fun with the Si4730. But today I'll be working on my Hallicrafters S-38E. https://hackaday.com/2020/02/12/all-band-radio-uses-arduino-and-si4730/
I think the comparison to a crystal radio is pretty apt. Winding a coil and hooking up a diode doesn't necessarily bless the project with the magic of radio any better than soldering a few components to some perfboard does. I would even argue that the utility of the final product may keep the builder interested longer.
I think N0ECK is right. But one thing I'd like to add is that the amount of hack value plays an important role. I'm comparing my iPhone, which I like as an appliance, but can't easily modify or customize, vs. my computer (running Linux) which pretty much encourages hacking and comes with tools for programming built-in. We should encourage kits and projects which get a result fairly fast, but also entice people to dig deeper.
Do we really need a purity test for who built the radio��? Everyone is at a different part of the learning curve, and if this is what gets you to the next level, and you learn something, good on you for doing it, right? We don’t complain about Pete using 5351s or not writing all his code from scratch because it’s just not smart to replicate something that’s already been done unless it’s fun or you learn from it. It’s ALL good��
When you know stuff, you can do stuff -- Pete Juliano.
I think the guy in the video knows stuff and is doing stuff. That makes it home brew with me. If we are to ADVANCE the ART of radio, at some point we have to stop thinking tubes and analog vfo's are the height of technology.
I look that this SDR receiver and think WOW that is very clever. 5 IC's and 3 Opamps and a handful of passives.
The real interesting part in this build is the use of a DSP Reverb IC used in audio production, being programmed to something it was not designed to and outputting USB, LSB and AM with -60db of opposite sideband rejection.
That is not just passing clever, its very novel and is advancing the art of radio.
Extensive opening on 28 MHz - 23rd Sept 2021
-
*Thursday 23rd September 2021:* There was a reasonably extensive opening on
the *28 MHz* band with FT8 signals heard from Indonesia to South Africa to
Pu...
Let's build something with Vacuum Tubes.
-
Introducing the PIMP. (That's Pete's IMP recreation).
With a Tip of the Cap to Joe Galeski, (W4IMP SK) I thought this rig which
is a 20M Sideband Transmitt...
HRWB 137 Interview with Andreas Spiess HB9BLA
-
In this episode we interview Andreas about he ham radio journey and how he
has become a big YouTube celeb. With over 300,000 subscribers and 400
videos,...
e-Bay PCB Thermal Transfer Paper
-
This past weekend I had the first opportunity to try my *e-Bay purchased*
thermal transfer paper. It was to be used in my iron-on PCB work as a
hopeful imp...
AGC for a Termination Insensitive Amplifier
-
For AGC controlled IF stages in receivers I have often chosen a 2 or 3
stage dual gate MOSFET strip, or a cascode arrangement with a bipolar and
JFET pair....
Testing Audio Amplifiers
-
After finishing the microphone amplifier and the AF amplifier modules, it
is time to test them. For the experienced builder with scope and signal
gene...
Arduino Clock
-
Initial code using a 120x120 TFT display and a realtime clock module.
/*************************************************************************...
QLG2-SE GNSS/GPS Receiver kit
-
This GNSS/GPS receiver module kit is mostly SMD (pre-assembled), and
includes a high sensitivity active antenna with 2m coax and SMA connectors.
It has ...
More Projects with Telegram
-
*In the past years I had always blogged my projects, but due to time,
effort and format I had stopped doing that. But my projects continued,
and I have ...
-
A Simple Speech Processor
(For QRP/SSB Homebrew Transceivers )
Over the last few weeks I had been thinking to build a small AF speech
processor to add to...
Modifications to the Dayton/FDIM-2019 Antuino
-
The Dayton Antuino has sub-optimal performance. This is a short note on
improving it to an 80 db range of measurements. The trouble with Antuino
2.0 (the o...
A New Look for your uBitx!
-
Adding a "Cool Blue" Display to your uBitx!
The standard "green background" with black lettering frequently reminds me
that I suffer from Chronic seasicknes...
Posts
I think the comparison to a crystal radio is pretty apt. Winding a coil and hooking up a diode doesn't necessarily bless the project with the magic of radio any better than soldering a few components to some perfboard does. I would even argue that the utility of the final product may keep the builder interested longer.
ReplyDeleteI think N0ECK is right. But one thing I'd like to add is that the amount of hack value plays an important role. I'm comparing my iPhone, which I like as an appliance, but can't easily modify or customize, vs. my computer (running Linux) which pretty much encourages hacking and comes with tools for programming built-in. We should encourage kits and projects which get a result fairly fast, but also entice people to dig deeper.
ReplyDeleteDo we really need a purity test for who built the radio��? Everyone is at a different part of the learning curve, and if this is what gets you to the next level, and you learn something, good on you for doing it, right? We don’t complain about Pete using 5351s or not writing all his code from scratch because it’s just not smart to replicate something that’s already been done unless it’s fun or you learn from it. It’s ALL good��
ReplyDeleteWhen you know stuff, you can do stuff -- Pete Juliano.
ReplyDeleteI think the guy in the video knows stuff and is doing stuff. That makes it home brew with me. If we are to ADVANCE the ART of radio, at some point we have to stop thinking tubes and analog vfo's are the height of technology.
https://circuitsalad.com/2020/01/06/compact-si5351-based-sdr/
DeleteI look that this SDR receiver and think WOW that is very clever. 5 IC's and 3 Opamps and a handful of passives.
The real interesting part in this build is the use of a DSP Reverb IC used in audio production, being programmed to something it was not designed to and outputting USB, LSB and AM with -60db of opposite sideband rejection.
That is not just passing clever, its very novel and is advancing the art of radio.
It's all good! I tip my cap toward anyone who takes the time to build something that they can order from Amazon. Kindred spirits.
ReplyDelete73!