Podcasting since 2005! Listen to Latest SolderSmoke
Thursday, March 4, 2021
"The Secret Life of..." Tribal Knowledge!
Saturday, February 27, 2021
Update from the Wizard of Wimbledon -- "Always listen to Pete"
In a recent podcast, Pete mentioned that Leo Sampson (the young Brit who is rebuilding the sailing yacht "Tally Ho") should seal the deal with his girlfriend. Well, it seems that "life coach" should be added to Pete's already impressive list of abilities (homebrew hero, pasta chef, guitar player, etc.) A while back Pete gave similar advice to Jonathan, M0JGH. This morning, Jonathan reported in, confirming that Pete's advice was completely correct. A "mixing product" arrived early in the lockdown. Congratulations to Jonathan and his remarkably radio-tolerant wife. It seems Leo should be shopping for a ring.
--------------------------
Dear Bill and Pete
Sunday, January 31, 2021
Repairing My Maplin Audio Waveform Generator
Friday, January 22, 2021
Jenny List's Favo(u)rite Things
Over on Hack-A-Day Jenny List (G7CKF) has a really nice article about ham radio and homebrewing. She truly has The Knack: She got her start in radio electronics at age 9 when her parents gave her George Dobbs's Ladybird book.
https://hackaday.com/2021/01/21/a-few-of-my-favorite-things-amateur-radio/
One of her paragraphs really seemed to capture the SDR-HDR conflict that we so often joke about:
The age of the homebrew RF tinkerer may be at a close, at least in the manner in which I started it. Nobody at the cutting edge of radio is likely to be messing around with discrete transistor circuits in the 2020s, unless perhaps they are working with extremely exotic devices up in the millimetre wavelengths. It’s all software-defined radios, opaque black plastic boxes that deliver a useful radio experience on a computer but that’s it. No more homebrew, no more tinkering.
Whew, good thing I'm not on the cutting edge. It sounds kind of sad. Oh well, that leaves more discrete transistors for us to tinker with.
Jenny's Profile on Hack-A-Day:
[Jenny List]: Contributing Editor and European Correspondent
Jenny List trained as an electronic engineer but spent twenty years in the publishing industry working on everything from computer games to
dictionaries before breaking out and returning to her roots.
She grew up around her parents’ small farm and blacksmith business in rural England, so making (and breaking) things is in her blood. Countless projects have crossed her bench over the years, though these days you’ll find her working with electronics and in particular radio, textiles for clothing and costume, decrepit classic cars, and real cider from first principles.
When she’s not writing for Hackaday she works on language corpus analysis software, designs and sells amateur radio kits, sits on the board of Oxford Hackspace, and is a freelance electronic design engineer and programmer.
- Hackaday Articles
- Hackaday Profile: Jenny List
- Twitter: @Jenny_Alto
- Personal Website: Language Spy
Thursday, January 21, 2021
Saturday, January 16, 2021
Nick M0NTV's Really Useful SDR Transceiver (video)
Wednesday, January 13, 2021
A Wizard Near Blackpool: M6AGC's Wonderful Homebrew Rigs
Alan's YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCISxWaAc5xW6oFElxGN4xWg
One of Alan's recent projects (spotted on Facebook):
Tuesday, January 12, 2021
Pete N6QW and Steve G0FUW Talk to RSGB About Homebrew (Video)
Saturday, December 5, 2020
"Radio, Radio" By Elvis Costello and The Attractions
Thursday, November 19, 2020
Diode Ring Magic
Friday, November 13, 2020
How Does My Singly Balanced, Two-Diode, Single Transformer Product Detector Really Work?
As young James Clerk Maxwell used to say, "What's the go of it?" and "What's the particular go of it?"
I studied this circuit carefully when I was using it as a balanced modulator in my DSB rigs. I wrote up my conclusions in my book "SolderSmoke -- Global Adventures in Wireless Electronics."
BALANCED MODULATOR CONFIGURATION:
When I was using it as a balanced modulator, I had the RF "carrier" signal going into L1. This RF signal was 7 dbm, enough to switch the diodes on at voltage peaks. With the "center tap" of L2/L3 grounded for RF, this meant that when the "top" of L2 is negative, the "bottom" of L3 is positive. In this situation BOTH D1 and D2 will turn on and conduct.
When the top of L2 is positive, the bottom of L3 is negative and neither of the diodes is on. Neither conducts.
So we have the RF signal turning the diodes on and off at the frequency of the RF signal.
Audio from the microphone and mic amplifier is sent into the center tap connecting L2 and L3. The level of this audio is kept low, below the point where is could turn on the diodes. The center tap IS grounded for RF by the .1uF capacitor, but it is NOT grounded for AF. That is key to understanding this circuit.
In essence by turning the two diodes on and off at the rate of the RF signal, the audio signal is facing severe non-linearity through the diodes. We could say it is alternately being multiplied by 1 and 0. This non-linearity is what is required for mixing. We therefor get sum and difference products: Sidebands. At this point, Double Sideband.
The way the transformer is set up means the RF carrier signal is balanced out: Even when the two diodes conduct, the top of R1 and the bottom of R2 are of equal and opposite polarity, so there is no carrier signal at the junction of R1 and R2 (they are actually a 100 ohm variable resistor that can be adjusted to make SURE they balance out). So the carrier is suppressed and all that remains are the sidebands: Suppressed Carrier Double Sideband.
PRODUCT DETECTOR CONFIGURATION:
What happens when we use this circuit as a product detector in a receiver? Let's assume we are working with a 455 kc IF. If you run a 454 kc 7 dbm BFO signal into L1, it will turn the diodes on and off as described above. But you will NOT be able to put the 455 kc IF signal into the center tap of L2/L3 -- that center tap is GROUNDED for 455 kc. So you will have to run your IF signal into the resistors, and take the audio output from the center tap of L2/L3. This works. I tried it in my HA-600A. But there is a problem: Envelope detection.
In this arrangement, we are balancing out NOT the 455 kc IF signal, but instead we are balancing out the BFO. We don't really NEED to balance out the BFO -- it can easily be knocked down in the audio amplifiers, and IT is not responsible for the problematic envelope detection. We DO need to balance out the IF signal, because if that gets through we can get simultaneous "envelope detection" and product detection. And believe me, that does not sound good.
So I tried putting the IF signal into L1, and the BFO signal into the resistors (as shown above). I took the audio from the junction of L2/L3. This seemed work better, with envelope detection greatly reduced.
BUT WHAT'S THE GO OF IT?
But how is this circuit mixing in this configuration? The strong BFO signal is still controlling the diodes, BUT, with the BFO signal coming in through the resistors, when the top of R1 is positive the bottom of R2 is ALSO positive. In this situation D1 will conduct but D2 will not. The IF signal is facing a big non-linearity. This will result in sum and difference frequencies. The difference frequency will be audio. But with D1 and D2 turning on and off in a very different way than we saw in the balanced modulator, how does the mixing happen?
I think the answer comes from the summer 1999 issue of SPRAT, the amazing journal of the G-QRP club. Leon Williams, VK2DOB wrote an article entitled "CMOS Mixer Experiments."
Here is Leon's 74HC4066 circuit:
I think those two gates (3,4,5 and 1,2, 13) are the functional equivalent equivalent of the two diodes in our product detector. In Leon's scheme the VFO is supplying signals of opposite polarity. Ours is providing only one signal, but the fact that the diodes are reversed means that they act just like the gates in Leon's circuit. The transformer is almost identical to the one we use in the product detector.
Let's look at the output from Leon's circuit:
Thursday, September 24, 2020
Global Specialties Corporation 6000 Frequency Counter -- Anyone have a Plessey SP8630B Chip?
Continuing my effort to improve my workbench and its test gear, this week I turned to an old frequency counter that I picked up at the Kempton Park Radio Rally in London many years ago. It was not working when I got it, but long-time SolderSmoke listeners will recall the tale of woe that resulted from my having soldered a replacement IC (that Tony Fishpool G4WIF had sent me) UPSIDE down. Tough times my friends, tough times.
Well, I'm working on it again. First I converted it from 220 to 110 power. I had a transformer in the junk box that fit nicely, both electrically and mechanically. In the course of doing this, I learned something about this counter that I did not know: As long as it is plugged in, even if you turn it off, the time-base oscillator keeps running. And get this Color Burst Liberation Army members: The oscillator runs at 3.579545 MHz. TRGHS.
With sunspots scarce and with Pete pessimistic about the solar cycle, VHF and UHF now seem more interesting. I need to have more test gear for the higher frequencies. This counter works up to 650 MHz. Yea!
When I first fixed this thing, I was quite pleased to get it going with "Input A -- 5 Hz to 100 MHz." But now I want to get "Input B -- 40 MHz to 650 MHz" working also. I used a 50 MHz signal from my newly repaired HP-8640B to trouble shoot Input B. I think one of the divider chips is bad. It is a Plessey SP 8630B. Does anyone have one of these chips in their junk box?
Monday, August 31, 2020
Global Collaboration: The uSDX -- A Multi-Mode QCX
Sunday, August 30, 2020
Sunday, July 26, 2020
Alan Wolke W2AEW on IMD, NanoVNA and more (presentation to UK club)
This video is another reminder of how lucky we are to have Alan Wolke W2AEW as a fellow radio amateur, and as a teacher and mentor.
In this video, Alan is talking to the Denby Dale Amateur Radio Society in Yorkshire, UK.
The first part of his talk is about IMD products, the importance of 3rd order products, and the benefits of attenuation.
The second part of the talk (after a few questions) is a look at the NanoVNA, which Alan cites as the "Toy or Tool of the Year."
I learned a lot from both portions of the presentation. I now find myself wanting an H4 model of the NanoVNA (bigger screen). Or maybe even an F model. Thanks to Alan, I now know what S21 and S11 means.
Thank you Alan, and thanks to the Denby Dale ARS.
73 Bill
Monday, June 22, 2020
Join up NOW!
Thursday, June 18, 2020
You must join the CONSTRUCTOR CRUSADERS
Wednesday, May 27, 2020
Antennas, Money, and Ham Psychology
make it fit. (on the back fence).
WIth 5 watts CW on 40m I can hit the USA reverse beacons most mornings.
It was about £9 ($11) to make - but if you count the Spiderbeam
12m pole, it was another £98 ($120).
I have a little George Dobbs story relating to aerials. Probably around
him and have a beer with afterward.
Friday, May 15, 2020
Nick M0NTV's Quarantine Rig: The Bread Bin 80
Hi Bill,