Podcasting since 2005! Listen to Latest SolderSmoke
Thursday, October 17, 2024
How to Organize a Small Shack
Friday, April 19, 2024
Deep Space Station 43 -- Canberra, Australia
DSS-43 boasts a pointing accuracy of 0.005 degrees (18 arc seconds)—which is important for ensuring that it is pointed directly at the receiver on a distant spacecraft. Voyager 2 broadcasts using a 23-watt radio. But by the time the signals traverse the multibillion-kilometer distance from the heliopause to Earth, their power has faded to a level 20 billion times weaker than what is needed to run a digital watch. Capturing every bit of the incident signals is crucial to gathering useful information from the transmissions.
The antenna has a transmitter capable of 400 kilowatts, with a beam width of 0.0038 degrees. Without the 1987 upgrade, signals sent from DSS-43 to a spacecraft venturing outside the solar system likely never would reach their target.
Saturday, October 14, 2023
Paul VK3HN's Video on Scratch-Building and SOTA
Tuesday, October 10, 2023
A Low-Power (QRP) Contact from Australia to Spain (with video from both sides!)
Thursday, September 28, 2023
A Look at Old Radios in Australia (video)
I thought you guys would like Peter Parker's latest video. And in it, Dean KK4DAS might see a clue or two for his Halli restoration/repair project.
Wednesday, September 27, 2023
Ciprian YO6DXE Puts the Michigan Mighty Mite on AM! (video)
Tuesday, June 27, 2023
Australia and Apollo 11 -- Honeysuckle Creek
Tuesday, February 7, 2023
VK2BLQ Builds the High-School Direct Conversion Receiver
Friday, December 2, 2022
But why? Why Can't I Listen to DSB (or AM) on my Direct Conversion Receiver?
I've said this before: I just seems so unfair. We just should be able to listen to DSB signals with our beautifully simple homebrew Direct Conversion receivers. I mean, building a DSB transmitter is a natural follow-on to DC receiver construction. And we are using AM shortwave broadcast stations (Radio Marti --I'm looking at you) to test our DC receivers for AM breakthrough. But when we tune these stations in, they sound, well, awful. So unfair! Why? Unfortunately it has to do with laws. Laws of physics and mathematics. Blame Fourier, not me.
Over the years there has been a lot of handwaving about this problem. From Doug DeMaw, for example:
In his "W1FB's Design Notebook," Doug wrote (p 171): "It is important to be aware that two DSSC (DSB) transmitters and two DC receivers in a single communication channel are unsatisfactory. Either one is suitable, however, when used with a station that is equipped for SSB transmissions or reception. The lack of compatibility between two DSSC (DSB) transmitters and two DC receivers results from the transmitter producing both USB and LSB energy while the DC receiver responds to or copies both sidebands at the same time."
That's correct, but for me, that explanation didn't really explain the situation. I mean we listen to AM signals all the time. They produce two sidebands, and our receivers respond to both sidebands, and the results are entirely satisfactory, right? Why can't we do this with our Direct Conversion receivers? I struggled with this question before: https://soldersmoke.blogspot.com/2015/07/peter-parker-reviews-dsb-kit-and.html You can see in that post that I was not quite sure I had the answer completely correct.
It took some discussion with a fellow Vienna Wireless Society member, and some Googling and Noodling for me to figure it out. But I think I've got it:
Imagine a station transmitting a DSB signal at 7100 kHz with a 1 kHz tone at the AF input. There will be signals at 7101 kHz and at 7099 kHz. Assume the carrier is completely suppressed.
We come along with our DC RX and try to tune in the signal.
Remember that they heart of the DC RX is a product detector, a mixer with the VFO (or PTO) running as close as we can get it to the suppressed carrier frequency (which we can't hear).
Lets assume that we can somehow get our VFO or PTO exactly on 7100 kHz. The incoming signals will mix with the VFO/PTO signal. We are looking for audio, so we will focus on the difference results and ignore the sum results of the mixing.
The difference between 7101 and 7000 is 1 kHz. Great! And the difference between 7099 and 7000 is 1 kHz also. Great again, right? We are getting the desired 1 kHz signal out of our product detector, right? So what's the problem?
Here it is: SIDEBAND INVERSION. Factoring in this part of the problem helps us see the cause of the distortion that plagues DSB-DC communication more clearly.
Remember the Hallas Rule: Whenever you subtract the modulated signal FROM the unmodulated signal, the sidebands invert. So, in this case, we are subtracting that 7099 "lower sideband" signal FROM the 7100 VFO/PTO signal. So it will invert. It will become an upper sideband signal at 1 kHz. We will have two identical 1 kHz signals at the output. Perfect right? Not so fast. Not so PERFECT really.
The perfect outcome described above assumes that our VFO/PTO signal is EXACTLY on 7100 kHz. And exactly in phase with the suppressed carrier of the transmitter. But if it is even SLIGHTLY off, you will end up with two different output frequencies, signals that will move in and out of alignment, causing a wobbling kind of rapid fade-in, fade-out distortion. You can HEAR this happening in this video by Peter Parker VK3YE, starting at 6:28:
And you can see it in this LTSpice simulation.
On paper, using simple mixer arithmetic, you can tell that it will be there. With the VFO/PTO just 1 Hz (that's ONE cycle per second) off, you will end up with outputs at 1.001 kHz and at .999 kHz. Yuck. That won't sound good. These two different frequencies will be moving in and out of alignment -- you will hear them kind of thumping against each other. And that is with a mere deviation of 1 Hz in the VFO/PTO frequency! We are scornful when the SDR guys claim to be able to detect us being "40 Hz off." And before you start wondering if it would be possible to get EXACTLY on frequency and in phase, take a look at the frequency readout on my PTO.
Now consider what would happen if the incoming signal were SSB, lets say just a tone at 7101 kHz. We'd put our VFO at around 7100 kHz and we'd hear the signal just fine. If we were off a bit we'd hear it a bit higher or lower in tone but there would be no second audio frequency coming in to cause distortion. You can hear this in the VK3YE video: When Peter switches to SINGLE Sideband receiver, the DSB signals sound fine. Because he is receiving only one of the sidebands.
The same thing happens when we try to tune in an AM station using a Direct Conversion receiver: Radio Marti sounds awful on my DC RX, but SSB stations sound great.
My Drake 2-B allows another opportunity to explore the problem. I can set the bandwidth at 3.6 kHz on the 2-B, and set the passband so that I will be getting BOTH the upper and the lower sidebands of an AM signal. With the Product Detector and the BFO on, even with the carrier at zero beat AM sounds terrible. It sounds distorted. But -- with the Product Detector and BFO still on -- if I set the 2-B's passband to only allow ONE of the sidebands through, I can zero beat the carrier by ear, and the audio sounds fine.
There are solutions to this problem: If you REALLY want to listen to DSB with a DC receiver, build yourself a synchronous detector that gets the your receivers VFO EXACTLY on frequency and in phase with the transmitter's oscillator. But the synchronizing circuitry will be far more complex than the rest of the DC receiver.
For AM, you could just use a different kind of detector. That will be the subject of an upcoming blog post.
Please let me know if you think I've gotten any of this wrong. I'm not an expert -- I'm just a ham trying to understand the circuitry.
Saturday, November 26, 2022
Another Trivial Electric Motor
Below is a video from 2006:
Wednesday, September 7, 2022
Building a Workshop (or a Shack) in a Crawl Space
Tuesday, August 23, 2022
SolderSmoke Podcast #156 -- November 4, 2013 -- Interview with Peter Parker VK3YE of Melbourne, Australia
Special hour-long interview with Peter Parker, VK3YE
-- Early experiences with radio
-- CW
-- DSB Gear
-- Simple gear, and gear that is TOO simple
-- VXOs, Super VXOs and Ceramic Resonators
-- Building receivers
-- Chips vs. Discrete
-- Making the leap to SSB
-- The Knob-less wonder and the BITX
-- No need for a sophisticated workshop
-- Advice for new phone QRPers
Peter's Blog: https://vk3ye.com/
Peter's YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/vk3ye/featured
Friday, August 19, 2022
VK3IO's Wonderful Antenna Tuning System
Saturday, July 16, 2022
Hex DX! First Long-Haul Contact with the New Hex Beam - VK4KA on 20 SSB
Monday, June 27, 2022
Thoughts on Homebrew, Makers, DIY, and Hams -- from Lex PH2LB
Sometimes we get a comment that is so good that we elevate it to the main blog page. That was the case with Lex PH2LB's comment on the blog post of Owen Duffy (yesterday).
----------------------
When I started the hobby, it arose out of technological curiosity, the interest in understanding things and the will to make things myself (designing myself was not my main goal). It doesn't matter to me whether it is 100% DIY or a kit (such as Heathkit, Elecraft, QRP-Labs etc) which is modified or not after construction. Just having fun with the hobby and pushing boundaries. And yes I also have some off-the-shelf transceivers (I'm super happy with my FT817ND) and my QO-100 uplink is also a kit (which is then already soldered a little more than average). As far as new tools are concerned: here at home are 2 types of 3D printers, various tools for SMT assembly, and I have a nice workshop equipped with tools and equipment for metal / plastic / wood processing. And every day I try to learn something new, because I stand by the IBEW moto : If you know stuff, you can do stuff.
Am I a maker then? I wouldn't call myself that. Just like I don't call myself a hacker because I'm quite handy with computers, technology and have certain skills. I'm just a hobbyist who wants to do and make things after work.Saturday, June 25, 2022
Australian Homebrew: Owen Duffy ex VK1OD now VK2OMD. Are Hams Makers?
This week I stumbled upon this amazing blog from Australia. I had to check with Australian friends to find out more about the author. Owen Duffy has for many years been a rigorous homebrewer who has documented his findings on his blog: https://owenduffy.net/blog/
For example, Owen asks the question, "Are hams makers?" https://owenduffy.net/blog/?p=122
There is a lot of great material on this blog. It goes back to 2013. Peter Parker notes that an earlier version of the blog (before Owen was forced to change his callsign from VK1OD to VK2OMD) goes back even further and is accessible via the Way-Back Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/*/
Check it out. Lots of really useful and interesting material there. Thanks Owen. And thanks to the Australian friends who provided background info.
Monday, April 18, 2022
Ruby Payne-Scott and Early Australian Radio Astronomy
Tuesday, March 15, 2022
VK2BLQ's Two-Tube Regen with a SolderSmoke Dial
Sunday, February 27, 2022
VK3HN's Amazing Summit Prowler 9 Homebrew Transceiver - A Masterpiece of Miniaturization (VIDEO)
Thursday, December 2, 2021
Peter Parker VK3YE Inducted Into QRP Hall of Fame
Thanks to VK3HN for alerting me to this.